Is Corporate America Selling Out Our Country?

Within hours of Pearl Harbor, President Franklin Roosevelt began summoning the heads of American industry to Washington. Roosevelt knew the country would need an unprecedented buildup of planes, ships and other war materiel.

Without hesitation, American companies responded. Ford, Packard, Chrysler, 3M, Hormel, General Mills, Pillsbury, Cargill, Boeing and many other major U.S. companies gave their all to the war effort. At Roosevelt’s request, the president of General Motors even left his company to oversee the war production effort as a lieutenant general in the U.S. Army. Roosevelt’s initial request for 50,000 new airplanes per year was openly mocked by the Germans as outlandishly high and impossible to achieve. But the mighty U.S. industrial base roared to life and pulled it off. By war’s end, the United States was producing 100,000 warplanes a year. U.S. industry literally transformed itself to save our country. It’s fair to wonder if our current CEOs would do the same.

Would American companies in a new globalized economy drop everything for their country? Do American companies even consider themselves American anymore? (RELATED: Peter Thiel Blasts ‘Treasonous’ Google For Choosing China Over U.S. Military)

The Daily Caller News Foundation asked 19 of the biggest names in corporate America if they saw themselves as “American” companies. It shouldn’t be a very hard question to answer. But 10 of the 19 — including Amazon, Apple, Chevron and General Electric — refused to answer altogether. The others mostly gave weasel answers. Only General Motors and the bank JPMorgan Chase were willing to clearly identify as American institutions. And even with them, the actual record is cause for concern.

‘The Squad’ Hates Our Country

Modern progressives accuse America of being racist, imperialist, and xenophobic in the past. To the extent that they mean racially conscious, expansionist, and insular, they’re right too. Conservatives who deny this look foolish, as when they claim Martin Luther King Jr. was a Republican in spirit. Many non-whites will always resent early American history and traditional American symbols such as the Betsy Ross flag and the national anthem.

The solution is not to condemn the Founders, but to destroy contemporary racial dogmas. Unless we dispose of these modern “values,” we must constantly justify our national existence to non-whites and immigrants. No self-respecting people does this.

Whatever President Trump’s intellectual shortcomings, he was fundamentally right that these non-white congresswomen, especially Ilhan Omar, hate our country. If you were in a relationship with someone who said she loved you but hated your appearance, beliefs, and character, you’d leave. Rep. Omar says she and her colleagues speak from “extreme love for every single person in this country.” Really? Does that include President Trump? His supporters? Those who respect the “genocidal” Founders? White nationalists?

Consider Congolese immigrant Therese Patricia Okoumou, who scaled the Statue of Liberty on the Fourth of July to protest American immigration laws. She showed up in court with a shirt saying, “No human is illegal on stolen land.” This isn’t “love;” it’s naked hostility. It’s an open declaration that our country is illegitimate. If whites showed up in other countries demanding they change their customs, heroes, and traditions, the natives wouldn’t stand for it.

Ilhan Omar and her ilk are foreigners whatever their passports say. President Trump recognizes this in some vague way; so do many of his supporters. Yet he can’t really define the problem. He enthusiastically accuses Congresswoman Omar of being anti-Semitic, but lacks the courage to call her anti-white or say that she is not really American.

She and others don’t hate only our government or our economic system. They hate the founding population—white people. And they will replace us if they can. Our political leaders must stop the invasion. If they don’t, whites must replace them.

GOP Rep. Gooden (R-TX) Accuses Speaker Pelosi of Sedition After Telling Illegal Aliens how to Avoid ICE (VIDEO)

Gooden accused Speaker Pelosi of sedition.

Rep. Gooden: Suggesting that people break the law in this country is sedition. And I think we are going down a very difficult path that we, and I say we to represent Nancy and the gang, that we cannot turn back on.

Gooden then accused Rep. Escobar of “allegedly” instructing her staff to cross the border into Mexico and encouraging illegals to break the law.

Barbarian African Horde Storms The Panthéon In Paris

Barbarian African Horde Storms The Panthéon In Paris

About Hunter Wallace 7469 Articles

Il est INADMISSIBLE de voir des clandestins revendicatifs occuper, en toute impunité, ce haut lieu de la République qu’est le #Panthéon.

En France, le seul avenir d’un clandestin devrait être l’expulsion, car c’est la LOI. MLP

— Marine Le Pen (@MLP_officiel) July 12, 2019

The moment the #GiletsNoirs occupied the Pantheon in Paris. ??

— Belal Awad|???? ???? (@Baloo1987) July 12, 2019

Marauding African Immigrants storm the #Pantheon in France, demanding “Papers and Freedom for all”

— Virginia Dare (@vdare) July 12, 2019

African Immigrants are being organized by Progressive Antifa, Anarchist, Communist LGBT groups in France and mobilized to occupy ancient relics of western civilization.

— Virginia Dare (@vdare) July 12, 2019

Do you remember when Notre Dame Cathedral burned down during Holy Week in Macron’s France back in April? I don’t recall ever hearing an explanation of how or why that happened.

5G as a Globalist Tool

The creators of 5G are pinning their hopes on enough wirelessly addicted, self indulgent humans being open to the opportunity for new digital bells and whistles to take over every personal and professional task.  The success of 5G depends on human being willingness to acquiesce those burdensome tasks of setting a timer on the coffee brewer or starting the washing machine so that humanitywill have more time to escape into virtual reality toys rather than taking a hike in nature.

Without explicitly saying so, the ultimate objective is to free humanity from the burden of personal interaction with the rest of humanity in favor of interaction with computerized machines or gadgets.

As if the need for human relationship is a genetic weakness, the true existence of human beings becomes extraneous as increased surveillance and monitoring of all daily activity is recorded.

As the State will monitor all thought, our personal bathroom habits, whether to become pregnant (or not) or personal private choices, all will be entered into a personal data registry – not unlike China’s ‘social credit score’ evaluating each citizen’s loyalty.

There will be no on or off switch as opting out will no longer be permitted.

The human heart of kindness, love and compassion will be but a memory of the past when our neighbors were our friends and our friends were like family and our family a scant remnant of a poignant reminiscence that has no authenticity.  These are not exaggerated forecasts of the future but a creepy reality check of what the Silicon Valley and apparently Israel/Intel techno twits have in store as humanity becomes complacent to its own basic life decisions and that of future generations.

The Democratic Candidates Are in a Bubble on Immigration

Take the tragic tale of Oscar Ramirez and his young daughter Valeria, the father and daughter captured in death in that heartbreaking photograph. Ramirez’s widow explained to the Washington Post why her husband wanted to move to America: He wanted “a better future for their girl.” This is an admirable goal, but it is classic economic immigration, and it would appear, based on what we know, that it has absolutely nothing to do with asylum. Here again is the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services definition: “Refugee status or asylum may be granted to people who have been persecuted or fear they will be persecuted on account of race, religion, nationality, and/or membership in a particular social group or political opinion.”

But somehow the courts have decided that you qualify for asylum if there is simply widespread crime or violence where you live, and Ramirez was also going to use that argument as well. A government need not persecute you; you just have to experience an unsafe environment that your government is failing to suppress. This so expands the idea of asylum, in my view, as to render it meaningless.

Courts have also expanded asylum to include domestic violence, determining that women in abusive relationships are a “particular social group” and thereby qualify. In other words, every woman on the planet who has experienced domestic abuse can now come to America and claim asylum. Also everyone on the planet who doesn’t live in a stable, orderly, low-crime society. Literally billions of human beings now have the right to asylum in America. As climate change worsens, more will rush to claim it. All they have to do is show up.

Last month alone, 144,000 people were detained at the border making an asylum claim. This year, about a million Central Americans will have relocated to the U.S. on those grounds. To add to this, a big majority of the candidates in the Democratic debates also want to remove the grounds for detention at all, by repealing the 1929 law that made illegal entry a criminal offense and turning it into a civil one. And almost all of them said that if illegal immigrants do not commit a crime once they’re in the U.S., they

Is the Democratic Party an Existential Threat to our Homeland and the American People?

The “debate” last night (June 27, 2019) among Democratic Party candidates for president of the United States revealed that all of them are for a wide open border(s) which they view as an open door to anyone and everyone from anywhere in the world to come in and colonize our nation. While Social Security which Americans paid into is frozen at low end single digit increases and pension funds are either frozen or marked for decreases in a time of high inflation — Democrats are eager to hand over all kinds of financial incentives to illegal entrants along with free health care and taxpayer funded accommodations. All this is happening while ISIS and other terrorists are threatening to attack American targets on the 4th of July.

Writing “your” congressman has no effect, since they are all signed on to The Great Replacement. It’s frightening to see these Democrats pandering to illegal aliens while figuratively spitting in the faces of American citizens who oppose their demographic replacement strategies.

What are Americans to do when their own government and media are hell bent on flooding our nation with Third World invaders? The ballot box is no longer a viable option to save our nation from these insane politicians, especially since activist judges have ruled that it is unconstitutional to prevent foreigners from ignoring our immigration laws while our “lawmakers” are proposing decriminalizing illegal entrance into the United States.  The pattern has been set for hundreds of millions of foreigners to walk right across our borders and demographically replace us while we are taxed to finance the Pentagon and the impotent Department Homeland Security — the Maginot Lines of our time.

With President Donald Trump’s hands tied on illegal immigration by activist judges, or worse, his willing betrayal of his voter base per the promised wall along the Mexican border and deportation of illegal aliens who ignored orders to self-deport, all lawful options to stop our demographic replacement have been prevented by the elected officials who are supposed to represent the American people — not Mexicans, Central Americans, Hatians, Congolese, or other nationalities.

Is it any wonder that various agents in Washington and Silicon Valley are doing a full court press to silence conservative voices and financially destroy persons who voice strong opposition to the Great Replacement?  What started out as the Southern Poverty Law Center’s “Hate Map” has been weaponized recently to criminalize alleged “hate groups.”  We are living in frightening times.

S. Byron Gassaway

Review: Google Chrome has become surveillance software. It’s time to switch.

By Geoffrey A. Fowler | The Washington Post Columnist

You open your browser to look at the web. Do you know who is looking back at you?

Over a recent week of web surfing, I peered under the hood of Google Chrome and found it brought along a few thousand friends. Shopping, news and even government sites quietly tagged my browser to let ad and data companies ride shotgun while I clicked around the web.

This was made possible by the web’s biggest snoop of all: Google. Seen from the inside, its Chrome browser looks a lot like surveillance software.