The population of Canada is 36.71 million. The population of the United States is 325.7 million.
So this would be comparable to the U.S. bringing in 8,700,000 immigrants, roughly the entire population of the state of Virginia.
If anyone thinks that won't cause massive upheaval, they're terminally naive or ideologically blinkered. Among these
immigrants will be a certain number of Islamic jihadis, but Canadian officials show no concern about that whatsoever. Even
to discuss such a possibility would be "Islamophobic."
A tale of Chinese influence and demographic
replacement in Vancouver, Canada
(Bloomberg Businessweek) -- The black coupe pulled up outside the Starlight Casino in a suburb
of Vancouver. The driver got out, greeted a man in a red shirt, and pulled two bulging white plastic bags from the trunk.
He led the way into an empty noodle shop next door, where he handed over the bags before returning to the car. The man in
the red shirt took the bags into the casino, through a cavernous glass lobby with signs in English and Mandarin. At a cashier's
desk, he opened one of the bags to present his cargo: thousands of green Canadian $20 bills, bound into loose bricks with
yellow plastic bands.
The cashier's counting machine would need to run continuously
for more than 10 minutes to riffle through all the notes, which came to more than C$250,000 ($192,000). Converted into chips
that could be cashed out later, whether or not they'd been wagered at the tables, the money would be spendable anywhere
in Canada, unimpeded by questions of provenance.
The transaction at the Starlight
on that winter day in 2009, depicted in video footage released this year by the government of British Columbia, was one of
thousands made in and around Vancouver over the past decade. Known abroad primarily for its stunning Pacific Coast setting
and athletic lifestyle, the city has since become one of the world's largest sluices for questionable funds moving from
Asia into Western economies. One academic terms the process "the Vancouver model": a seamy mingling of clean and
dirty cash in casinos, real estate, and luxury goods made possible by historic ties to China and by Canada's lax record
of fighting financial crime.
90% of Saskatchewan First Nations have faced bad drinking water
Failure to resolve water problems
due to Ottawa’s ‘Band-Aid solution,’ says toxicologist
CENSORSHIP OF TORONTO'S MAYORALTY DEBATES HURTS EVERYONE
To practise the politics of exclusion, a downtown elitist
cabal and their shadowy minority quarterbacks have tried to exclude populists Dr. James Sears and Faith Goldy from all debates.
The tactic works this way. Leftist challenger Jennifer Keesmaat only wants to debate mushy middle soft lefty Mayor John Tory.
Coward Tory is terrified of facing the glamorous and clever Faith Goldy on such topics as his collaborating in the invasion
by Trudeau illegals and filling up all available homeless shelters while Haitians and Nigerians who fill places homeless Canadians
should have or Dr. Sears' critique of the Mayor's handling the Greektown Massacre: why did Tory choose to visit the
very mosque frequented by killer Faisal Hussain, shortly after the fatal shootings?
So, Tory insists he'll not participate
in any debate where Dr. Sears or Faith Goldy appear. Thus, most establishment debates have been boring affairs with the two
media-chosen front runners Tory and Keesmaat clashing with three minor "diverse" candidates invited to add, shall
we say, some multiculti colour. Some of Faith Goldy's supported have crashed debates from which she has been excluded
and heckled to draw attention to this elitist control and, of course, are then thrown out.
Much to their credit, the
Markland Woods Homeowners Association refused to play the elitists' game and invited all 35 mayoral candidates, plus Ward
2 candidates for councillor and school board, to a forum at St. Clement's Church, Wednesday, October 10. The packed church
basement was standing room only. The forum was briskly run with each candidate allotted five minute.
By my count, a
dozen mayoralty candidates of the 35 attended. Tory and Keesmaat were no shows. Every candidate was interesting. A few were
comical like perennial candidate Kevin Clarke, a Negro with a preacher's voice, who used much of his five minutes to deliver
a moving tribute to the late Mayor Rob Ford.
Most of the candidates had something interesting to say. However, in most
debates that succumb to the Tory rules, voters will never hear what these folks have to offer. For instance, Thomas O'Neill
argued: "All candidates running for office, no matter how offensive their views, should be given impartial media coverage.
We cannot pre-select someone with no respect for the democratic process." Especially cutting was his remark aimed at
those who would limit debate if it offends snowflakes: "The news media is there to inform not persuade. I don't care
about anybody's feelings."
Dr. Sears presented a charming picture of himself growing up and now becoming a
father. He spoke of the key role of his satirical YOUR WARD NEWS, Canada's leading anti-ZioMarxist publication. He was
clearly not the monster media smears had prepared the crowd for. "I like this guy," the gentleman beside me said.
Faith
Goldy, who is extremely tall, took the mike with the assurance of the broadcaster/videographer she is. "I am tough on
crime, easy on taxes," she announced. "I shall put the public safety before political correctness." It would
have been fun to see the mushy Mayor Tory wince. "I will bring back carding. We don't care about the colour of your
skin but the criminality of your character," she added. That would have made the establishment indulged, Soros funded
Black Lives Matter turn blue. The City's budget spends 70 per cent on salaries and just 10 per cent on serving the public.
"As Mayor, I am going to demand performance for those salaries," she said.
And had no show Tory been in attendance,
he'd have yelped to hear : "Thanks to Justin Trudeau's policies, illegal immigrants are coming to Toronto and
55 per cent of the beds in the homeless shelters are illegals. I'll be bringing to Toronto a 'Toronto First' mentality
so that every homeless Canadian man or woman has a warm bed to sleep in." One can see why the Mayor wouldn't want
to be there."
And, of course, the real losers were the voters who, in most "all candidates" [not] debates,
would not have heard these voices and ideas. -- Paul Fromm
The Fourth Turning and a New Homeland for Euro-Canadians
In
“The Ethnic Cleansing of Whites in Canada,”
I argued that a defined territory is crucial for our survival. According to Dr. Frank Slater, “the special quality
of a defended territory is that it insulates a population from the vicissitudes of demographic disturbances . . .”
Acquisition and defense of territory, notes Slater, are an integral part of the tribal strategy of humans. The passionate
relationship between a people and its homeland has been constant throughout history. A people can suffer many setbacks, but
as long as it retains its own territorial space, it can recover. [i] In the long run, only territory ensures survival, and
human history is largely a record of groups expanding and contracting, conquering or being conquered, migrating or being
displaced by migrants. The loss of territory, whether by military defeat or displacement by aliens, brings ethnocide.
In the United States, the Trump Administration cannot deliver on their signature
campaign promise: to build a wall on their southern border. It’s hard for me to understand how the Americans have put
up without a wall for so long but if the Republicans can’t get their wall built, and Brexit can’t Brexit how
do we, in Canada, expect to establish an immigration moratorium and repeal our Multiculturalism Act? Not very likely. I
propose that we make contingency plans for a new homeland(s) inside Canada.
Canadians from the founding cultures, need to look beyond a conventional political
solution. If Catalonia, Khalistan, Israel, Wakanda, “Farrakhanland,” Scotland, Kurdistan, Quebec, and “New”
California, why not a homeland for European-Canadians in South-Western Ontario; the Maritimes; the Prairies, around Quebec
City or the interior of beautiful British Columbia? It’s British Columbia, after-all.
We can’t
be accused of discriminating against people we don’t live with. The massive transfer of wealth and the $35B-$40B fiscal
costs of immigration will disappear. Infrastructure savings would be enormous. We’ll never have to worry about being
branded racists or xenophobes again. Taxes will decline. Hospitals, currently operating at 135% of capacity in both the
Fraser River Valley and the GTA, largely as a result of chain migration, will gradually decline to their intended 85% cap,
and we’ll be able to move on our highways again. The Canadian environment could heal. Employment equity plans will
vanish, and organizations can get thousands of our kids out of their parent’s basements and into the workforce.
A new homeland for the
founding cultures might seem fantastic or a pipe dream to some but consider that we are now, as of the credit crisis of
2008-09, at a significant historical inflection point. In their bestselling book, The Fourth Turning: What the Cycles of History Tell Us About America’s Next Rendezvous with
History, authors William Strauss and Neil Howe describe the seasonal nature of
history and foresee an inevitable period of decay that will destroy existing social and political institutions.
Imagine a Pristine Homeland for Euro-Canadians
Steven K. Bannon, former advisor to President Donald Trump (and many others),
agrees that a Fourth Turning began in 2008 with the global financial credit crisis and has argued that the administrative
state must be dismantled in advance of the final climax. Canadians, too, should tear down everything that is no longer functional,
including our pathological immigration policies and official multiculturalism. In order to renew, forests need fires and
rivers need floods.
The
Anglo-American Saeculum
Strauss and Howe theorize that the history of a people moves in 80-to-100 year cycles
called "saecula." The concept goes back to ancient Greece, where it was believed that at a given saeculum's
end, there would come "ekpyrosis," a cataclysmic event that destroys the old order and ushers in a new one in
a trial of fire. We owe much to the cradle of Western civilization.
Strauss and Howe define a social generation
as the aggregate of all people born over a span of roughly twenty years or about the length of one phase of life: childhood,
young adulthood, midlife, and old age.[ii]
An average life is 80 years, and consists of four periods of ~20 years
Childhood → Young adult → Midlife → Elderhood
A generation is an aggregate of people born
every ~20 years
Baby Boomers → Gen X → Millennials → Homelanders
Each generation
experiences "four turnings" every ~80 years
High → Awakening → Unraveling →
Crisis
Fourth
Turning Chronology
The
Late Medieval Saeculum (1485) Wars of the Roses (1459-1487)
The Reformation Saeculum begins
with the Protestant Reformation and ends with the Armada crisis 1588 – a period of 103 years from one crisis climax
to the next crisis climax The New World Saeculum begins
with the Puritan Awakening and ends with the Glorious Revolution in 1688 – a period of 100 years from crisis climax
to crisis climax
The Revolutionary Saeculum or the “Great Awakening” ends in 1781 with
the American Revolution – a period of 92 years between climax of the Glorious Revolution and the climax of the American
Revolution
The Civil War Saeculum ends in 1863 (1860-1885) – a period of 82 years between the
Revolutionary War climax and the American Civil War climax
The Great Power Saeculum ends in
1944 and coincides with the Great Depression and World War II- a period of 81 years from the Climax of the American Civil
War
The Millenial Saeculum begins with “Consciousness Revolution.” The global Financial
Crisis of 2008, indicates the start of the Fourth Turning, climaxing in 2025? – A period of 81 years from the previous
climax of World War II? [iii]
All Fourth Turnings
are marked by periods of dread and decay in which the American (or English) people were forced to unite to rebuild a new
future, but only after a significant conflict in which many lives were lost. It typically starts with a catalyst event,
followed by a period of regeneracy. Following that there is a defining climax in which a "war" (the coming war
might take many forms) for the old order is fought. Finally, there is a resolution in which a new world order is created
out of the ashes.
Bad
News Sells
To be fair,
sweeping theories of history are not as well received in academia. The Fourth Turning is non-falsifiable and has been a tough
sell to professional historians who have now been co-opted into re-writing and revising history to allow for the occupation
of formerly Western ancestral homelands by alien out-groups. William McLoughlin, a former history prof at Brown, believes
that it is fantasy to think that “if you put enough data together and have enough charts and graphs, you’ve
made history into a science.” Fair enough. Those sophisticated enough to lose money in the capital markets at any time,
will confirm that the future is unknowable by definition. Nevertheless, the Turnings are much more than mere happenstance
or data mining.
Readers who have stock market experience can find support in Elliot’s 5th and final
wave of his grand super-cycle and with Nikolai Kondratieff’s wave theory. The cycle of crises also corresponds with
cycles of war identified by Arnold Toynbee and geopolitical cycles identified by William R. Thompson. Keep in mind Vladimir
Lenin’s comment that “In some decades, nothing happens; in some weeks, decades happen.”
There’s
a lot to be concerned about. North Korea and Iran; the staggering mountain of immoral public debt in the United States and
Canada and throughout the West; the crouching, racist and hyper-nationalist tiger dreaming of global domination and increasingly
militarizing, with weapons stolen from the West, the South China Sea, or what I prefer to call the North Philippine Sea,
are all potential sparks. The world’s greatest threat according to Bill Gates, is an influenza pandemic. The Institute
of Disease Modelling predicts that a severe flu pandemic could kill more than 33 million people in just 250 days. Several
concerning strains are already circulating.[iv]
Finally, in my view, there is a growing threat of a second civil
war exploding out of the incredible divisiveness in the United States. Either of these four “sparks;” debt,
China, a flu pandemic, or the outbreak of a second American Civil War or a combination of these threats could ignite the
final Fourth Turning “climax” sometime between now and 2025, give or take, according to the theory.
The generational cycle cannot explain the role or timing of these individual threats. Nor can it account for the great
events of history, like the assassination of Archduke Ferdinand, the bombing of Pearl Harbor, President Kennedy’s
assassination, 9/11 or the Lehman insolvency. What the generational cycle can do, according to Strauss and Howe, is explain
how society is likely to respond to these events in different eras. It is the response, not the initial event, which defines
an era according to the theory. [v] According to Strauss and Howe, the crisis period lasts for approximately 20 years.
A financial collapse driven by a debt implosion is certainly plausible. Total debt in the U.S., for example, including
Federal, State, Municipal and contingent liabilities in Social Security, Medicaid and Medicare is roughly $207 Trillion.
In Canada, the Province of Ontario is a financial train wreck. The province will need to increase borrowing to finance another
spending shortfall, adding to an existing mountain of debt, borrowed on our grandchildren’s credit cards, and is forecast
to rise to $325 Billion, or more than $22,500 for every man, woman and child in the Province.[vi]
Newly elected
Premier, Doug Ford, will find his hands to be tied but at least he has the right mindset and there is some hope that his
populist surge will spill over Federally next year. To make matters worse, Moody’s has joined the Bank for International
Settlement (BIS) and S&P Global is warning that Canada’s banking system, yes Canada’s, is facing a growing
threat of souring consumer loans amid rising interest rates. Canada’s ratio of household debt to disposable income
reached a new astonishing record of 171% in the 3rd Q of 2017 and the proportion of uninsured mortgages has increased to
60% from 50% five years ago.[vii]
It is my view, however, that the final spark for the Fourth Turning will be
ignited by a Second American Civil War. Either way, the day of reckoning is coming. The chickens will come home to roost.
The Fourth Turning, whatever the final cause(s), has the potential to trigger a political upheaval beyond what we
can possibly ever imagine. Strauss and Howe see a return to a more traditional and conservative social order as one of the
outcomes. If history is a guide, the probability of retribution for former “collaborators” and for those who
resist the new expectations for conformity will be high. There will be no assumption of compassion for the traitors and
complacency will not be an option.
On the bright side, fertility rates will rise again, quality of life and prosperity
will climb and public investment in infrastructure will surge. We will enter into a period of Peace, Order and Good Government
but many nations are likely to be fractured and geographically divided by ethnicity as a consequence.
Yes, there
is hope for a new homeland for the founding cultures. This may be our opportunity to take our nation back and hold those
responsible for giving it away, without our consent, as traitors. Gird your loins for our next rendezvous with destiny.
Canadian “elites” babble about “diversity,” about how
much better a country we will be in 2036 when white Europeans are just another minority and we have become a “gorgeous
mosaic” of every race, tribe, creed and culture on earth. To many Canadians, such a future entails the death of our
nation. To Canadians, millions of African, Chinese, Indian, Arab and Islamic peoples settling in our lands means the annihilation
of the historic nation we love, the nation that came into being to preserve us. We will never forgive politicians, whether
by accident, or design, if they change our country completely and forever.
Many of these aliens who occupy Canada
today have no “cosanguity” with either of the two founding cultures or the larger white European family. From
the growing expressions of resentment, contempt and even hostility towards us, it’s clear they we’re not compatible.[viii]
Canada is increasingly being filled with people who have absolutely no connection to the great historic Dominion of Canada.
They can’t be faulted. Canada was never really created for them but as anti-white sentiment goes mainstream and all
of Canada’s non-whites increasingly assert their own racial and ethnic heritage, what will keep Canada together when
we lose our white majority? If Euro-Canadians had the same group loyalty as Sikhs, Muslims, Chinese and Indians we would
never have permitted these aliens into our land to begin with.
Our ancestors did not create the heroic and adventurous
Hudson Bay Company, fight on the Plains of Abraham, Beaver Dam, Stoney Creek, Lundy’s Lane, Michilimackinac Island,
Queenston Heights, Paardeberg andLeliefontein, Ypres, Vimy Ridge, Passchendaele, The North
Atlantic, in Defence of Hong Kong, The Battle of Britain, Dieppe, D-Day, The Liri Valley, Normandy, the Scheldt, Kapyong and Kandahar, and endure the enormous hardships
and sacrifice of the Great Depression, in order for baby boomers to turn the country over to alien out-groups and foreigners
who have nothing in common with us and who don’t share our values.
Canada is much more than an idea; it’s
much more than a shopping mall. The Fathers of Confederation did not frame the British North America Act to celebrate diversity.
It’s the “British” North America Act, after all. Canadians did not spill their blood and treasure around
the world for multiculturalism and to become a marginalized, despised but “privileged” minority in the land bequeathed
to us by their ancestors; our home and native land. Did we?
If we don’t stop this madness, and establish
our own lands, Euro-Canadians will learn soon enough that the non-whites our hyper-altruistic elites usher into 24 Sussex
Drive will not fritter away their demographic, political and economic gains in fruitless displays of moral superiority the
way we have. A Canada run by non-white aliens and foreigners will be a shockingly different place. Competitive racial and
ethnic altruism is not a game non-whites play.[ix] Canadians must force our traitorous elites to abandon policies that will,
before long, destroy us all and everything that was bequeathed to us.
I should be careful what I wish for, but
as far as I am concerned, the Fourth Turning can’t come soon enough. We are a people. We can create great things if
left free to be ourselves and only we can be ourselves. If Canada ceases to be majority white country, it won’t be
a country at all. Euro-Canadians should never give up on the idea that this country belongs, first and foremost, to us.
We will fight back and the fight has, in fact, already begun. A cold wind is blowing. Winter is coming…
During a recent town hall discussion, Trudeau likened returning ISIS fighters to when “Italian families settled in Montreal in the postwar years” and discussed how such influxes of immigrants
were discriminated against for their style of dress and religion.
The disclosure that the Canadian government will
open its arms to terrorists comes shortly after it was revealed that Trudeau’s government removed from an official report all references to ISIS fighters returning to Canada and posing a potential chemical weapons threat, despite warnings from
its own public safety department.
Wednesday, 18 April 2018
We Must End Foreign Immigrant Occupation and Chinese Buyout
of Canada
This is our
country now, thanks for giving it to us, Whiteys! We Chinese need space, we are 1/4 of the world's population!
It appears that the new Immigration Minister, Ahmed Hussen,
a Muslim refugee from Somalia, a country, by the way, where 98% of the women are subject to female genital mutilation, doesn’t
know or more likely, doesn’t care, what his own department is thinking. According to a comprehensive internal report
from the Department of Immigration, uncovered by an Access to Information Request, titled "Evidence-Based Levels and Mix: Absorptive Capacity," obtained by Vancouver lawyer Richard Kurland, our immigration “capacity” is declining, as it relates
to housing, health care, education, ethnic enclaves, public transit and, finally, religious tensions. Most Canadians, from
the founding cultures, would agree. Toronto’s transit infrastructure is woefully inadequate and housing costs are
soaring largely because of our immigration policies. Seemingly, both Mr. Hussen and Mr. Trudeau are unaware of, or worse,
willfully ignoring their own research. Immigrants, it seems, are struggling to afford decent housing for their large families. I’m struggling for my
relatively small family. Many are not learning either official language. The study found that 3 out of 10 children needed
ESL training yet they were born in Canada. What are they doing here if they can’t speak either official language? Is
it possible that our official languages are racist, too? Needless to say, this language gap also limits employment opportunities.
New Canadians are having difficulty getting access to health care, apparently, despite the fact that its “free,”
and they are not dispersing across the country. Most choose to settle in our largest cities with their own ethnic group
and this self-chosen isolation creates further barriers to “integration.” For the managerial elite, big government
Liberals and their Marxist inspired enablers, however, these are wonderful features of third world immigration, not a glitch.
As social trust collapses, forced diversity and mass immigration function as the Cialis of the State, a powerful vasodilator
for an ever-larger government (Kirkpatrick, 2016).
I'm starting to understand that demands for equality and
employment equity were never about equality and equal opportunity. The demands are, and always have been, for more concessions
and more redistribution of wealth from Us to Them and it well never stop. What began as an obligation not to discriminate
against “minorities” has now evolved to become an obligation to discriminate against the founding cultures.
Our banks, utilities and telcos are loathe to hire our kids. Canada’s largest corporations are carrying water for
our diversity and multicultural elites. Every new Canadian needs a bank account, heat and hydro and a smart-phone. Ever-growing
revenues are very seductive. These organizations could care less about per capita income. Big business is all in.
The report noted that religious and cultural accommodation, specifically related to forced marriages, and family violence,
have been in conflict with Canadian values. No kidding. There are a number of other issues that are in conflict with Canadian
values and unique to Muslims, in particular: polygamy, niqab’s and burqas, FGM, honour killings, taharrush, Christophobia,
forced child-marriage, Hijra, Sharia and last but certainly not least, jihadi violence. Islam and the West are fundamentally
incompatible yet we have ushered these aliens right through the gate into our jeweled cities, not just to drive cabs, but
to run the place. Have we lost our minds?
It’s particularly troubling, the report notes, that second-generation
visible minority immigrants are likely to “perceive” that they have been subject to discrimination and 43% are
convinced that they are being treated “unfairly.” It shouldn’t be surprising to readers that many of the
terrorist attacks across Europe and the United States, including mass shootings have been perpetrated by second generation
immigrants.
The report also suggests that immigration officials are “in a fog” about the effects
of mass immigration on our home and native land. Hundreds of thousands of international students and “temporary”
foreign workers add to the problem. In the United States, FBI Director Christopher Wray told a Senate Intelligence Committee
meeting, recently, that many students from China, who comprise almost one-third of their foreign student body, are “collectors.”
They are collecting information and intelligence for the Motherland. Why would it be any different in Canada? Note to our
elites: Please close all Confucian Institutes in Canada. They are proxies for the Chinese Communist Party, you fools.
Our Housing
“Challenge”
We Chinese
love multiculturalism: we will buy you out of the housing market!
The report also specifically
identifies housing as a challenge for “new” Canadians. The housing “crisis” and soaring real estate
prices are what drove me, personally, into our immigration quagmire. There has been much said about it so I won’t
spend a lot of time rehashing “beneficial” ownership and money laundering at River Rock Casino, outside of a
few comments. First, it is painfully clear to me that our housing problem is demand driven both from immigration and off-shore
buying. Not exclusively, but overwhelmingly from mainland China, for decades but starting in earnest in 2009, as the Canadian
dollar was under pressure during the credit bubble and subsequent financial collapse centered in the United States.
Crony capitalists were moving money out of totalitarian China at attractive for rates and into relatively safe havens.
Who could blame them? In Canada, they found the rule of law, property rights, clean air and pristine water, freedom, democracy,
magnificent infrastructure including world class public and private schools and Universities and Colleges entirely built
before they arrived, by European-Canadians.
Peter Schweizer, in his deeply researched and well documented book,Secret
Empires, lays out a very compelling argument that corruption is upstream from policy. He’s right. I’m still,
to this day, angry with the Ontario and British Columbia Real Estate Boards, brokers, experts, and “analysts”
who so smugly and confidently assured us that foreign buying (and immigration) had nothing to do with runaway prices. It
was a supply-side problem. Toronto and Vancouver had become great “world-class” cities like London, Paris, New
York, Singapore and Hong Kong! If that’s world-class, I’m with the Brexit crowd. I don’t want any part
of it.
There are others that echo these ridiculous claims. CMHC, The Conference Board and Stats Can joined in
and suggested that our formerly efficient real-estate markets, which for the better part of 400 years, more or less, had
been in equilibrium, are now in under-supply. It had nothing to do with demand. No, nothing to worry about there! Our increasingly
radical immigration policy is outside of acceptable debate, so it is never discussed.
Canada, in the words of
a TD bank economist, was a kite caught in a hurricane of international capital. In Hong Kong, ground zero for Chinese money
fleeing the totalitarians, a “mosquito apartment” of 130 square feet, that young people are sharing, roughly
the size of a parking space, sells for U.S.$650,000. Immigration policy in Canada is fueling our housing pyre. Why would
we want to import this nightmare into Canada? Is anyone paying attention?
Finally, to make matters worse, in 2016,South
China Morning Postjournalist Ian Young broke wide open our tax department’s failures. The Hong-Kong
newspaper revealed that CRA officials had been aware for decades of these tax-avoidance schemes and had ignored them. “They
were scared, the source noted, of being labeled racist” (Young, 2016). Are you kidding me? Australia and New Zealand
are finally standing up for sovereignty. New Zealand has banned selling any real estate to foreigners, including trusts,
shell/holding companies, temporary residents, foreign students, wealthy tech titans looking for a bolt hole and foreign corporations,
particularly Chinese state-owned enterprises (SOE’s). Canada should follow suit. What are we waiting for?
Government Has Failed
Us
Immigration Minister, Ahmed Hussen:
I am the face of your government, and I am in charge of who becomes a Canadian!
The failure
of our governments, both provincially and federally, to protect us is immoral. Not only have they failed to protect us, they
have been complicit in forcing us out of our own cities. Canadians must confront all those who have denied, collaborated
with or intentionally understated, the role played by foreign, corrupt money in pushing real estate prices to levels where
most Euro-Canadians, and immigrants, cannot afford to own a home. The treasonous Christy Clarke, for one, flew across the
Pacific Ocean and told corrupt Chinese billionaires the government of British Columbia was eager to permit foreigners to
“own a significant portion of Vancouver” (Cooper, 2017).
We must put an end to
foreign, particularly Chinese buying of Canadian real-estate and I would argue, foreign buying of Canadian assets in general,
including corporate assets by Chinese SOE’s. We must collect capital gains back-taxes and prosecute the fraudsters
who have broken our laws. We must place a moratorium on immigration and close down the seven new Visa Centre’s in
China until infrastructure and housing can catch up. Once we regain control of our markets and take the country back from
our incompetent public officials, immigration might be raised again, but only to levels that reflect our absorptive capacity,
environmentally, economically and culturally.
Since 1971, when Canada was still 96% from British, French and
European descent, Canadians have been sleepwalking into mass immigration and multiculturalism in which the descendants of
the voyagers, coureur-de-bois, Sir Isaac Brock, Alexander Graham Bell, Sir John A. Macdonald, Sir Frederick Banting, Sir
Edward Cornwallis, Laura Secord, Sir Sanford Fleming, Tecumseh, Billy Bishop, Samuel de Champlain, Madeleine de Verchères,
Alexander Mackenzie, David Thompson, Nellie McClung, Mackenzie King, and John Cabot, cower timidly before alien races and
religions and for fear of being branded a "racist." Enough!
The history of Canada is one in which European
frontiersman and then settlers, braved the unknown and carved out the greatest Dominion on the planet with their bare hands,
a musket, a paddle and an axe. It was a nation created by European men for European people. To this very day, non-Europeans
from all over the world are literally dying to leave their s-hole countries and occupy our homeland. Our complicit and hostile
“elites” are inviting them in to reap the benefits of Western Civilization in Canada. Do Canadians understand
what is being done to them?
The real question, frankly, is not that non-Europeans want to leave the squalor back
home, but why are the founding cultures so eager to hand over to foreigners the land of our ancestors? Why are we so eager
to permit these aliens to occupy and transform our nation? Surely there is more to it than the fear of being called “racist.”
“Elites” in our various levels of government, publicly funded schools, universities and media outlets, have
been waging psychological warfare, telling us that we are not us, that everyone else is us. They have been successful in
transforming "us" into “a nation of immigrants.” They took away the concept of shared ancestry being
the defining factor of a nation and inserted the idea that somehow a nation could be defined by “an idea” and
we let them. A nation is a people and the land they live on. Or used to. We swallowed it all, hook, line and sinker. They
have turned us into ethno-masochists.
It seems to me that we are bequeathing to our grandchildren a country that
we ourselves would not want to live in. In our collective guilt over the crusades, the Inquisition, the Empire, Residential
Schools and our remarkable success and the third world’s squalor and failure, we are handing it over to them. Progressives
are in near panic in a desperate and pathetic attempt to redefine North African Muslims, Indians, Sikh’s, Pakistanis,
Filipino’s, Bangladeshi’s, Chinese and transvestites as the only real Canadians. Here’s a good question:
Why would we want to become a minority in our own homeland and why should we cede political and cultural hegemony to these
alien out groups?
When you think it can’t get any worse, Ottawa is set to repeal, shortly,
section 38(1)(c) of the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act that rejects sick (including HIV, Down’s Syndrome and
many other diseases) and disabled immigrants. On a positive note, this will certainly make Canada more diverse. This is
a perfect example of our pathological altruism. To me, and hundreds of thousands of awoke Canadians, open borders, globalism
and multi-culturalism are an existential threat to our sovereignty and identity of the Canada we love. We’re losing
the country we grew up in.
Selling us Assisted Suicide
Mr. Hussen certainly seems to be in a fog and in light of the
recent increases to Canada’s annual intake. The right hand obviously doesn’t know what the left is doing. How
did he manage to force these unnecessary immigration increases on us? Maybe I can help shed some light. The first and primary
function of the progressive open-borders propaganda system; the Liberal Party’s “hidden agenda,” is to
control what assumptions people must have and thereby control the narrative. One of the tools to control these assumptions
is “price anchoring,” something marketers have been using for decades. For example, offer a service for $50.00
a month and few people will bite. Add a $200.00 option and what do you know, subscription rates rise. Add a $100.00 option
and you’ve got yourself a best seller. Almost primitive by today’s standards, but still very effective. This
is exactly how the Liberal Government recently deployedCentury Initiative(CI).
In the fall of 2016, Dominic Barton and his team at CI, told Canadians
that they recommended we take immigration up to at least 450,000/year for the foreseeable future. As Senior Global Managing
Partner of McKinsey & Company, a globalists’ globalist, you’d expect nothing less. What a relief when then
Immigration Minister, John McCallum, announced that the government would “only” be increasing our intake from
roughly to 300,000 and more recently, by the Honourable Ahmed Hussen, to 340,000. A best seller, indeed. What a relief.
If the Liberals win another 4 years I guarantee you the intake will rise to 450,000/year. That’s 1.8 million more
aliens in addition to the recent changes of another 1 million by election day 2020. If you think we have an absorptive capacity
problem now…
Why would Canadians want any increase in our population? Why emulate China, India, Indonesia,
Brazil, Pakistan, Nigeria, Bangladesh, or Mexico? The top 10 countries in the world with the highest human development index,
which is a composite statistic of life expectancy, education, and per capita income indicators, have a relatively low population:
Norway, Australia, Switzerland, Germany, Denmark, Singapore, Netherlands, Ireland, Iceland, Canada.
It’s
Not Racist to Want Less Immigration
Whites are
the True Builders of Canada: Family on Canoe Lake Algonquin Park.
A recent Ipsos-Mori
survey of 18 countries found a majority “do not think its racist to want less immigration for ethno-cultural reasons.”
And in 2006, a study by Harvard professor Robert Putnam, based on detailed interviews of nearly 30,000 people across America,
showed that the greater the diversity in a community, the less people trusted each other, the less they gave to charity
and worked on projects to improve the community, and the less they voted. In those communities, supposedly “enriched”
by diversity, neighbours trusted one another about half as much as they did in those communities that remained homogeneously
of European decent.
Yet Canada is precipitating out on racial lines. The benefits of cultural
diversity have clearly reached diminishing returns and the development of ethnic enclaves threatens national harmony and
security. Diversity is not our strength, diversity is so obviously divisive. The ideas that racial diversity is strength
and that “race is a social construct” are so preposterous and stupid that only a very intelligent person could
have thought them up.
Diversity doesn’t work in entirely non-European majority places such as Indonesia,
Rwanda, Uganda, Malaysia, Thailand, the Indian subcontinent, to name just a few. In the U.K., for example, outside of suicide-bombing,
rape-gangs, political corruption, violent crime, censorship, fraud, welfare dependency, expensive diseases, inbreeding, a
surveillance state, and “acid attacks,” diversity has showered Britain with blessings. I know, let’s bring
those blessings to Canada. I’m OK with a Muslim ban.
Canadians understand that the true cause of racism,
social dissonance and ultimately violence, is the very diversity that our “progressive” political, academic and
business elites proclaim as our greatest strength, more important than freedom of speech, assembly and ultimately, in the
not too distant future, of thought. Ethnic violence is a key feature of diverse societies around the world. The greater
the diversity, the greater the violence. All of this social engineering has been done without consultation with the Canadian
people. What are we thinking? Let’s start by taking our country back and tearing up the Canadian Multiculturalism
Act.
No
Economic Justification for Immigration
The economic arguments for continued mass immigration into Canada are nothing
short of lies. What labour shortages, exactly, do we suffer from and why aren’t our schools training our kids for these
positions? In a recent study by McKinsey, “What the Future of Work Will Mean for Jobs, Skills and Wages,” (Manyika,
Lund, Chui, Ko, & Sannghvi, 2017), the authors concluded that seventy-five million to 375 million people may need to
switch occupational categories and learn new skills and that between 400 million and 800 million individuals could be displaced
by automation and need new jobs by 2030, around the world. In the United States, and by extension, Canada, McKinsey concludes
that automation “may wipe out one-third of the workforce by 2030.” It has become impossible to defend Canada’s
immigration policies on economics and labour force requirements. We don’t need immigrants to prosper, but we’ll
be saddled with entitlement and support payments for which we don’t have the money. We’ll have to borrow more.
Let’s
Talk about It!
Real Canadian!
It’s
painfully clear that Canada has no further absorptive capacity, politically, economically, culturally or environmentally.
Real incomes have flat-lined for decades. We can't move on our highways; Ontario is now the recipient of humiliating
Federal Transfer Payments, despite, or more likely because so many immigrants are settling here; real estate prices are
being driven into the stratosphere by immigration, money laundering and foreign buying to such an extent that the Euro-Canadians
who built the magnificent physical and social infrastructure are being forced out of their own markets; "intensified"
and "densified," into a lower standard of living and quality of life, forced to live on top of one another; hospitals
are now operating at 135% of capacity, because, in fact, in Canada, we have our own "chain migration" problem.
Herbert Grubel, Professor of Economics (Emeritus), at Simon Fraser University has found that as a percentage of
all the immigrants granted permanent residency, in a recent study, only 19.5% were directly selected on the basis of their
skills and education. In other words, over 80 percent were not economic immigrants. If that isn’t chain migration,
what is it?
For all of their blemishes, at least our American cousins are discussing immigration, including the
merits of our “points” based system. They should think again. Why do legacy Euro-Canadians and Euro-Americans
want to work for an over-class of smart Chinese and Indian Brahmins, who slip in and out of Canada on 10-year travel visas,
don’t contribute or pay taxes but rush grandma into the country for free health care? These “ghosts” and
“astronaut dad’s” have cleverly shadow-flipped their $5, $10 and $20 million homes a few times and their
daughters live in them to attend UBC and U of T while collecting information for Beijing. This is simply a recipe for resentment,
shattering of social cohesion and civic disorder.
Furthermore, our points-based system strips poor, third world
countries of their best, brightest and most talented citizens. Canadians who claim to be concerned about world poverty and
inequity should be confronted. Why is it good for Canada to get richer by making poor countries poorer? It’s a form
of reverse colonialism and we should end it. While we’re at it, let’s end birth-right/anchor baby/obstetric
tourism. There is an entire industry serving China in Vancouver. In Canada, we have allowed media, academia, business and
left-wing political interests (our elites) to "manufacture consent" to borrow a concept from Chomsky. Immigration
is radioactive. Canadians are not permitted to talk about it.
There is a glimmer of hope. It is now possible
to drive from the Baltic Sea all the way to the Aegean without once leaving a country ruled by a populist/nationalist. These
parties surging throughout Europe and the United States advocate social, economic and environmental policies intended to
protect their own people and workers against the importation of cheap, low and high skilled labour; off-shoring of their
manufacturing base to China and in our case, Mexico; illegal asylum seekers and legal and illegal migrants who don't
share their values; and their communities against environmental apocalypse created by mass immigration. Nationalism and
populism isn’t difficult to understand. People want to live among and be governed by other people like themselves,
speaking the same language; with a shared history, traditions, mannerisms, faith, values and heroes. Not by strangers with
hijabs and turbans who don’t understand us and who we don’t understand.
The Greek poet in Byron’s
Don Juan, living under the oppressive Ottoman Turks, likewise looked back to the Greek tyrants of antiquity and sighed: "...but
our masters then Were still at least our countrymen."
Immigration for immigration sake has become increasingly
radicalized and pathological; a result of Western man’s hyper and competitive altruism, and Canada has no more absorptive
capacity. I for one, am angry about the transformation of our formerly Great Dominion; our home and native land, into an
airport departure lounge. I stand against the ethnic cleansing being waged against us. Our hostile and arrogant elites have
been wrong about Marxism, Stalinism, Maoism, Freudianism, lobotomies, Iraq, Syria, allowing China into the WTO, Bernie Madoff
and gym machines but they are absolutely convinced that Marxist-inspired open borders, multiculturalism and diversity are
the way forward for Canada and the West in general. They are obviously wrong again without the infinite wisdom of all Canadians
in democratic consent. We have no choice but to prepare for the coming fight. The right hand doesn’t know what the
left is doing.
What's This: No
'Diversity' for Israel: Bribing Illegals to Return to Africa?
The Zionist
lobby in Canada and the U.S. is vociferous in pushing "diversity" and massive Third World immigration, which will
eventually replace and render a minority the European founding\settler people However, when it comes to Israel, they are
not to keen on being replaced; they are not so keen on "diversity". As the following article shows, they are even
trying to bribe African illegals to return home -- actually not a bad idea for Canada.
And none other than Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
"Netanyahu has called the migrants' presence a threat to Israel's social fabric and Jewish character, and one
government minister has referred to them as èa cancerè". (Reuters, January 3, 2018). Yet, massive Third
World immigration has made the European founding settler people a minority in Toronto,. Vancouver, Mississauga, Brampton
and Markham. And we're supposed to just dance around like loonies singing: "Diversity is our greatest strength''
Paul Fromm
Director
CANADA FIRST IMMIGRATION REFORM COMMITTEE
Some 38,000 Migrants
Live in Israel – New Israeli Plan Offers Them $3,500 to Leave
An 11-year-old girl claimed on Friday that a man twice tried to cut off her
hijab as she walked to school with her brother. Police say the investigation is now concluded and "the events described
in the original news release did not happen." It's still not clear (to clueless libtards) why the girl reported the
false incident.
The story captured national attention and (the
fake attack) was denounced by Prime Minister Trudeau, Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne and Toronto Mayor John Tory.
Canadian undergraduates are assured by their history textbooks that “from the very beginning, the land that
became Canada was a multiracial place, the destination of a constant flow of new immigrants of varying ethnicities.”
The purpose of such deception is, of course, to disarm any skepticism about current Third World immigration by making it
appear to be a mere continuation of Canadian history. One aspect of the deception is to broaden the term “immigrant”
to include pioneers coming to a wilderness, not people merely moving from one country to another.
Today’s
textbooks begin with highly positive accounts of the “First Nations” who “lived in a reciprocal relationship
with nature,” “exhibited none of the negative features of capitalistic society,” and had tools “superior
to what the Europeans could offer.” Contemporary historians like to accuse their predecessors of “suppressing”
Indian “voices,” but as Prof. Duchesne points out, all of their own sources are European as well. What is new
is not that the Indians have been freed to speak for themselves, but that white historians are now determined to use them
as “pawns to serve contemporaneous political agendas.”
The
good news is that civilization has struck back; ISIS has been losing big in Iraq and Syria. The bad news is that many of
the terrorists who brought hell to earth in that region are actually citizens of Western nations, i.e., products of Islamic
colonization. Now they are headed “home,” battle hardened, experienced, and even more radicalized than they
were when they set off to murder and rape on behalf of the caliphate. Islamophile leftists like Justin Trudeau welcome them with open arms.
Government’s Proposal to Ramp Up Immigration
Levels is Misguided
Madeline Weld, President
Population Institute of Canada
The
Canadian government announced in October that it would significantly increase the intake of immigrants to Canada for each
of the next three years, with minimum levels of 300,000 each year. Since 1990, Canada has been accepting approximately 250,000
– and sometimes more – newcomers each year. In 2017, 75% of Canada’s population growth resulted from immigration.
Immigration
Minister Ahmed Hussen argues that the government’s proposal for even higher levels of immigration would promote economic
growth, overcome skills shortages and meet the demographic challenge of an aging population.
Population Institute
Canada believes that economic and demographic arguments for growing Canada’s population are on shaky ground, while
the negative environmental consequences of its rapid growth are very much in evidence, and growing. We contend that there
are no good reasons to grow Canada’s population and many compelling environmental reasons to stabilize and reduce
it.
It is true that Canada’s growing population over the past few decades has resulted in a bigger economy. There
has, however, been no growth in per capita wealth. The real earnings of the average Canadian worker have not changed, while
those of the poorest Canadian workers have fallen.
Economists Herb Grubel and Patrick Grady have calculated that immigrants
cost the government $30 billion more in services each year than they pay in taxes. And Immigration Minister Hussen admits
that his proposed increase in immigrant intake will cost at least an additional one billion dollars in resettlement expenses
each year.
Already, large numbers of young people, many with significant debt loads, face a very challenging job
market, one which Finance Minister Bill Morneau has called a “job churn.” Many job seekers, especially young
and new Canadians, have few prospects of secure employment and must work multiple contract or part-time positions. They
can only dream of better wages, a steady schedule and paid sick days. How, PIC asks, will adding hundreds of thousands of
additional job seekers improve the prospects of these Canadians, when increasing automation, the loss of factory jobs to
developing economies, and outsourcing are already putting significant pressures on Canada’s workforce?
It
has also long been recognized that the problems associated with an aging population cannot be solved through immigration.
Among studies showing that immigration, even at high levels, has little effect on Canada’s age structure is a 2006
analysis by the C.D. Howe Institute (No Elixir of Youth: Immigration Cannot Keep Canada Young). It found that to keep a constant dependency
ratio, Canada would have to have an unrealistically high intake of immigrants and by 2050 would be taking in 7 million immigrants
per year and have reached a population of 165 million. Due to the rapid and unsustainable growth of the human population
during the 20th century, all countries will have to deal with an aging population during the coming decades.
In
addition, the dependency ratio as currently calculated (number of workers for every person 65 years and older) merits re-examination.
No doubt many retired grandparents over 65 years old are helping to subsidize their grandchildren. The fees paid by elderly
people in retirement residences support many workers and economists anticipate a large intergenerational transfer of wealth
as aging baby boomers die. All these factors complicate the issue of the dependency ratio and suggest that it is simplistic
to use number of people over 65 versus the number working as a sole determinant.
Furthermore, many people 65 years
of age and older still work, some because they must, others by choice. Thus, designating every person a dependent at 65
is not realistic. It is also relevant to note that significant numbers of newcomers – and of the proposed increase
in intake – are in the family reunification category. Many of these are the parents or grandparents of earlier immigrants
and are therefore older than the average Canadian and more likely to require the healthcare services paid for by working
Canadians.
Clearly, the economic arguments for relentlessly driving population growth through high levels of immigration
do not hold up to scrutiny. There is also an increasing awareness that the size of a country’s economy or its GDP
is an inadequate measure of its people’s well-being. As Canada’s population grows, more Canadians are having
to contend with ever more crowded cities, increased traffic congestion, densification that has eliminated greenspace but
not urban sprawl, increasingly stressed infrastructure, rising housing costs, and longer waiting times for healthcare and
other government services. The resources of the cities in the southern belt of Canada where most Canadians live, and almost
all immigrants settle, are as overstressed as those in cities anywhere in the developed world. What’s more, a growing
population is putting enormous pressure on our irreplaceable farmland and very limited fruit-growing areas.
It
is wrong to consider Canada as an “empty” country when so much of it is unsuitable for human habitation or incapable
of supporting a dense population. The very high per capita “ecological footprint” of Canadians has already badly
eroded our biocapacity per individual. For example, the latest (2017) Living Planet Report by the World Wildlife Fund shows a
serious and significant decline in wildlife populations as our growing population and demands for space and resources convert
wildlife habitat to human uses.
Our finite planet cannot support a continuously growing human population and expanding economies. Canada,
too, is finite. And yet as a direct result of government policy, our population is growing as rapidly as the global average
of 1.12% annually. The policy to keep expanding our economy by growing our population through immigration is no more sustainable
than any other Ponzi scheme. Nor is the government’s planned immigration policy supported by a majority of Canadians
– an Angus Reid poll conducted in 2017 found that 57% of Canadians thought that Canada should accept fewer immigrants and refugees (see page 15 of document).
Before
increasing immigration levels, PIC believes it incumbent on government to assess the impact of current levels of immigration
and the impact that higher levels would have, not only on the economy and the revenue and costs for the government, but
also on the environment, climate
I just read in my morning newspaper that whites had become a minority in Toronto. My hometown, where I have spent my entire
life, is now a majority-minority city:
OTTAWA—Most people in Canada’s biggest city now identify
as visible minorities, as new census data shows increasing diversity in Toronto and many of its neighbouring suburban areas.
More than half of respondents to the 2016 census in the City of Toronto — 51.5 per cent — said they’re
from visible minority communities, a milestone that was narrowly missed when 49 per cent identified that way in 2011. [Author’s note: visible minority is the Canadian government’s term for non-whites.
Peter Brimelow’s use of it in Alien Nationdistressed some reviewers.]
Nothing is preventing these anti-White "rights activists" from migrating to the Middle East, Indonesia, Africa,
or Haiti where they can enjoy the fruits of living in countries where they would only come across White people who were
foreigners visiting as tourists, businessmen or aid workers helping to clean up the mess following a natural disaster that
the locals of color are incapable of dealing with.
THE BLOODFEST ON CANADA’S MAJORITY POPULATION CONTINUES
The Elementary Teachers’
Federation of Ontario has asked Ontario school boards to remove the name of Canada’s first Prime Minister (John A.
Macdonald) from the front of Ontario schools. This is the latest of the Trudeau-era blood-fests on Canada’s majority
population. The reason the teachers have given for their recommendation is this : The Teachers allege that Macdonald
was a major figure in a number of policies which caused quasi-genocidal consequences for Canada’s First Nations.
There are many reasons
why Ontario Teachers should retreat from this very foolish recommendation :
(1) The effects of Ottawa’s high and unnecessary
immigration intake since 1990 on millions of Canada’s majority European-based population (the builders of Modern
Canada) are genocidal and will probably make the effects of federal laws against Canada’s First Nations look insignificant.
Canada’s people of European descent are the new Indians. Aggressive, recently-arrived colonizers are here to make Canada
look like the failed states these newly-arrived came from. If Ontario Elementary teachers are looking for a recommendation
to make to Ontario school boards and to Ottawa, how about a new TRUTH AND RECONCILIATION COMMISSION which will uncover the
extent of the “NO WHITE MALES NEED APPLY” jobs policy, the poorly-researched Rosalie Abella Employment Equity
policy, and the Diversity Hiring policies all across Canada in the public and private sectors.
All of these policies discriminate
against Canada’s majority population and have had quasi-genocidal effects on the job aspirations of millions of Canadians.
Ironically, a significant number of those who are or will be discriminated against are the offspring of current Ontario
Teachers who belong to Canada’s European-based population. If not stopped, Ottawa’s policies will turn Canada’s
majority population (millions of Canadians) into a minority. Instead of waiting for 50 years, why not go after the
perpetrators of this discrimination while they are alive and can be locked up for a long time.
(2) If Ontario teachers are seriously
looking for a Prime Minister to destroy, as they are with Macdonald, they do not have to look very far. Instead of taking
aim at a Canada-Builder such as Macdonald, they should have considered the obvious : a Canada-Destroyer and gross incompetent
PM such as Trudeau. Shortly after his election in 2015, Trudeau publicly and proudly declared that he was a quisling
(traitor). He announced that Canada had no main culture, but only shared values. As far as he was concerned, Canada
was the world’s first post-national state. Here is what Trudeau meant : he would not protect Canada’s majority
population from the immigration invasion which a previous Prime Minister (his father Pierre Trudeau) had started in
the 1960’s and which a later Prime Minister (Brian Mulroney) had institutionalized in 1990. To achieve that goal,
Trudeau increased Canada’s intake to 300,000 in 2016 and maintained it for 2017.
If Ontario Teachers are looking for more evidence of
his incompetence, they need only look at the foolish announcements he made in early 2017 to potential asylum claimants.
Trudeau’s foolishness squarely places the blame for the current illegal immigration mess on the Quebec / New York
border on his shoulders. How about Ontario Teachers recommending that the money to pay for this disaster be taken out of
his pay check and the bank accounts of those who supported him when he made his statements.
(3) Canada’s education system
(as demonstrated by Ontario’s Elementary Teachers and many University Professors) has a systemic bias against people
of European origin. So-Called university professors have led the blood-fest—often getting large grants and special
academic appointments to perform their treachery. Their view is that Canada’s majority population has an inexcusable
history and has no right to exist—-let alone defend itself. In addition, they think that unjustified high immigration
should continue and should be allowed to overwhelm Canada’s majority population. Some ethnics will become decent citizens
of Canada. However, as a result of unnecessary immigration, Employment Equity and Diversity Hiring policies, a significant
number of ethnics have infiltrated the teaching profession at all levels —often with an axe to grind against Canadians
of European descent. Ironically, many professors are of European descent, yet they too virtually salivate at the thought
of perpetrating another blood-fest on their own kind. The obvious aim of a significant number of Canada’s ethnic groups
is to increase their numbers. In the case of the Muslim Brotherhood, as announced in its sinister Manifesto, their aim is
to destroy Canadian society. If Ontario’s teachers are looking for a cause to champion, what better cause is
there than one of demanding that Ottawa refuse to allow entry to Muslims who sympathize with the aims of the Muslim Brotherhood?
Here are three examples
of bias and outright blunders in one of the history text books used in secondary schools in B.C., Ontario and elsewhere.
.
(4) Ontario teachers
who think that the Canadian public will hold them in high esteem for passing such recommendations as their recent one against
John A. Macdonald are gullible at best. They should be made aware of a recent Angus Reid poll which found that
“a strong majority of Canadians in every survey demographic felt that people should ‘take into account the entire
life of an individual and principal legacy they left behind’.”
For sensible immigration policies for the 21st century.
The Syrians, or anyone claiming to be, are coming. So are the Sudanese, Somalis and Haitians. This is
an informal border crossing and so the rules that might protect Canada from this horde don't apply. Quebec has become
the weakest link in the Canadian border with the vast majority of border migrants invading the "True North" through
vulnerable points like the dead end of Roxham Road.
Encouraging Acts of Resistance in Quebec Against Our Replacement
In just one week, there have been at least four encouraging
acts of resistance in Quebvec as people speak up against the populatioon changes being wrought by the elite, without the approval
or even discussion by the victims, the European founding/settler people of this land.
And, of course, there was an
immediate and hysterical denunciation of the protests by politicians who should be respectfully listening to voice of their
constituents, not wagging scolding fingers of disaaproval at them.
1. A "White City" banner is hung over a
sing outside Saguenay, Quebec,. the mayor dutifully denounces it as "unacceptable"
Image may contain:
tree, outdoor and nature
2. Some sends a package containing a damaged Koran and a note suggesting that a proposed
Moslem cemetary be relocated to a pig farm. Okay, a little belligerent and crude, but Quebeckers were never consulted about
the importation of people radically different from themselves into the province, nor were other Canadians, for that matter.
3.
Voters in the small community of St. Apollinaire are actually given a referendum as to whether they want a Moslem cemetery
in their rural backyard. They say no, of course, to massive abuse from Trudeau and others. Here's an idea. Why doesn't
Trudeau or Quebec's Moslem cuddling premier allow them to have their cemetery in THEIR backyard?
Image may
contain: 1 person, smiling, outdoor Sunny Letourneau, leader of opposition to Moslem cemetery in Sainte Apollinaire
4.
Finally, and most positively a group calling itself Federation des Quebecois de souche(Old Stock Quebeckers) posted stickers
in and around Sherbrooke'
CBC News (July 20, 2017) reported: "In Saint-Honoré, Que., a wooden sign bearing
the words 'Saguenay, White City,' in French appeared overnight at the entrance to a cemetery that could offer burial
grounds for the Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean region's Muslim community. Saint-Honoré Mayor Bruno Tremblay told CBC News
the sign near the cemetery was "unacceptable." ... "I found it very xenophobic," he said. 'We're
having it taken down later, I've sent one of our guys from public works,' he said. 'In 2017, we need to be more
open-minded than that.'" What does the befuddled mayor mean. The Saguenay is overwhelmingly White. Why should it
not remain so? Does the mayor want it to become, say, overwhelmingly Arab?
"In Sherbrooke,
stickers were distributed by the Federation des Quebecois de Souche reading, "They will not silence us" and "Minorities
on our land: Never!" The federation was founded in 2007, in the middle of Quebec's reasonable accommodation crisis.
Now the group opposes "mass immigration," according to Rémi Tremblay, the group's president." Hard
to disagree withat that. Why would we want to be a minority in our own land?
CTV News (July 19, 2017) made a big drama
of a protest package sent to a controversial Quebec City mosque. "- A package containing a defaced Qur'an and a note
expressing [criticism] lim cemetery project has stoked renewed fears at a Quebec mosque. ... it contained a Qur'an that
had been slashed and a note suggesting the Quebec City mosque should use a pig farm as a cemetery.
ot)
"I
was shocked," Djamai said in a phone interview."
Quebec Premier Philippe Couillard condemned the incident,
describing it as "unacceptable and repulsive."
"It's hard to prevent the darker sides of human nature,"
Couillard said in Edmonton as he attended a meeting of the country's premiers. ...
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau
said the incident has nothing to do with Quebec or Canadian values.
'In any society, there will be people who are
intolerant or racist and I think the challenge of a strong society is to spend our time focusing on where we are similar and
not where we are different,"'Trudeau said in Quebec City.
''We consider it to be an attack that is
outside of our values and our way of living.'"
What is really "unacceptable" and "outside our
values" is imposing radically different people on Canadians, without discussion or our consent.
I
am a Canadian and This Is My Story
In the run-up to Dominion Day (now “Canada” Day) you may have come across a series of short video vignettes
submitted by “Canadians” to the CBC, which had encouraged them to “tell your story.” And
so they did, in droves.
But curiously it seemed that only “New
“ Canadians were so inclined. White home-grown, old-stock Canadians who wreaked of normality, heterosexuality
or ‘privilege’ were conspicuous in their absence. I wonder why?
The truth is, the CBC is not interested in ordinary Canadians, but extraordinary Canadians. Poster boys for
the first post-national state. That is, they want to showcase the Canadians who cut the politically correct mustard
or pass the ideological litmus test. Only tolerant and enlightened Canadians need apply. Friends of
the CBC, in other words. They do not want to “reflect” the image of present day Canada as much as
depict the image of the Canada they want to see unfold, the Canada of the future, the Canada they are trying to engineer.
Take a look at a sample of the "Canadians" who made to the
CBC hit parade, and you will get a flavour of what I am talking about: http://www.cbc.ca/2017/whatsyourstory
It is abundantly evident that the CBC was not celebrating “Canada”
Day, but Immigrant Day. July 1st is all about the deification of the immigrant, coupled with constant reminders
of our shameful treatment of indigenous people, just in case we forgot that we too are immigrants or descendants of immigrants,
and as such have no moral authority to restrict further immigration.
The
message was clear. Canada is a nation of immigrants. Immigration is what defines this country. Perpetual
immigration on a grand scale therefore is necessary to validate that contention. So move over, make way, park
your gripes, shut up and smile.
Thus, CBC viewers were subjected to
a parade of immigrants “of colour” and an assortment of the fashionably oppressed. Members of almost
every certified victim group. They told us of their heroic journey to a wonderful ‘welcoming’ country
where they could be free to be themselves. They concluded their tales with the same punch line. “This is my story
and this is my Canada.” Indeed it is.
But Canadians of European ancestry have stories to tell too. The CBC just doesn’t want us to hear
them. So in the interest of fair play and “inclusion”, I thought I might post the submissions of the excluded. The
bigoted ‘basket of deplorables’ whom the CBC deems unworthy of notice and unfit to speak. Stories
like these:
My name is Tracy Bennett and I was raped by a Somali taxi
cab driver in Edmonton, the city I once knew. After being shafted by diversity, I long to
return to the safety of a Canada that is long past. A past that I am told was “white and boring’. If
only I could be bored again. If only I could be bored by less congested streets, less gridlock, lower rents,
affordable housing, fewer ethnic gangs, unlocked doors and social cohesion. I feel unsafe, insecure and disconnected. This
is my story and this is their Canada.
“Halt
mass immigration”
My name is Mike Byers. I grew up
in Vancouver, became a journey carpenter and through hard work and dedication, I eventually established my own
home construction company. At one point there were 20 people in my crew, all paid at union rates. Then
my bids were undercut by Indo Canadian and Chinese contractors who employed untrained foreign born workers , many of them
illegal, at cut-rate wages. My business folded and now I am selling cars in Kamloops. This is my story
and this is now their Canada.
My
name is Shelly Peterson. I once had a dream that I could raise a family and own my own home here in Greater Vancouver,
as my parents did. But even with advanced degrees and well paid professional jobs my partner Mike and I have
trouble paying the rent, never mind find the money for a down payment on a small condo unit. Having kids is out
of the question. Mass immigration and laundered Chinese money have sent the city’s real estate prices into the stratosphere,
and many of the friends I went to school with have fled the city to find a life elsewhere. If they do,
they often have to settle for work unrelated to their skills or training. It seems that I will be forced to follow
their path. This is my story and this is now their Canada.
My name is Craig Muller. I spent most of my life working in the woods as a logger,
and I made some good money back in those days. But after I was injured, and the Workers Compensation Board turned
down my claim, I couldn’t put food on table. I lost my livelihood and my marriage. Since then
I’ve been living on the streets, most of the time. It’s funny that the government finds money for
Syrian refugees but not enough for people like me. They say they are going to build more social housing units
but it will be a drop in the bucket. I thought maybe that I could stay at the Welcoming Centre but it seems that
I am not welcome. I am not an undocumented immigrant. No one seems to be able to afford housing in
this city and when you look around you can see why. Too many people are coming in, and most of them are coming
in from you know where. This is my story and this now their Canada.
My name is Barbara Turnbull. Ever since I was a girl, I dreamed of becoming a school teacher. Nothing
in life seemed to be so rewarding. So when I entered university, I enrolled in the “Professional
Development Program”, and completed my teacher training. I sent in applications to school boards
across the province, but I could only find an opening in Vancouver. I found the job more challenging than I ever
imagined. It was not that the class sizes were too high---they were—but that there were so many students
who could not speak English adequately. I was overwhelmed. Instead of job satisfaction, I experienced
frustration, stress and exhaustion. And I am not alone. Many other teachers have suffered the same
fate. But whenever we complain to city politicians, they tell us that their hands are tied. The federal government
is not providing them with the money and resources to cope with massive numbers of immigrants. They say that
they are not in charge of immigration policy. But I notice that none of them lobby to cut immigration
intakes. I can’t take it anymore. I am looking for another line of work. This is my story
and this is now their Canada.
My
name is Michael Renwick. I grew up in Richmond B.C. when it was covered with the best farmland in Canada. In
my youth, nature was close at hand in every corner of the Lower Mainland. It was a paradise for kids. We
built forts in the woods, played on vacant lots, fished on the river and cycled on the dykes. As
an adult I became a passionate bird watcher, hiker and conservationist. However, mass immigration changed everything. Fighting
against development, densification, sprawl, and destruction of local habitats was a losing battle. Worst
of all, the environmental movement let us down. Instead of targeting the source of the problem---mass immigration-driven
population growth----they attacked symptoms. They hacked at the branches of evil rather than cut its root. The
Greater Vancouver and Fraser Valley I know and loved is gone, replaced by strip malls, big box stores, high rises, condos
and subdivisions. Its population is three times as large as the Healey report of 1997 said was ecologically sustainable. Saddened by
what transpired, I left the city to seek a quite haven in northern BC. Another
urban refugee. This is my story and this is their Canada.
My name is Tim Murray. You know my story. And you know that this is
not my Canada.
Disclaimer: The people above are fictional
but their experiences are real enough to the many who have lived through them. In this case fiction, as Stephen
King said, is the truth inside the lie.
Canada's population is 35 million people. Canada accepts roughly 300,000 immigrants
every year. 4 out of 5 of Canada's immigrants are visible minorities. Experts state that Canada will be almost 80-percent
non-white in less than a century.
Commenter Faith Goldy observes that:
Canadians are constantly reminded that "diversity is our strength"- it's the unofficial
motto of Justin Trudeau's administration. But do the numbers indicate real diversity? Or is "diversity" just
code for population replacement?
Despite polls showing that 71% of Canadians would not have voted for the measure, Canada’s Parliament,
with the strong backing of Justin Trudeau’s Liberal government, passed a motion this week 201 to 91 that critics say
singles out Islam for special protection. Tabled by Muslim liberal MP Iqra Khalid, M-103 urges the federal government
to “condemn Islamophobia” and to “develop a whole-of-government approach to reducing or eliminating
systemic racism and religious discrimination including Islamophobia.” The term “Islamophobia”
is nowhere defined in the motion.
A petition on CitizenGo asking MPs to stop the “restrictive ‘anti-blasphemy’”
motion has been signed by 79,500 people.
“This motion will encourage legislation that would criminalize speech
deemed ‘islamophobic’ and lay the groundwork for imposing what is essentially a Sharia anti-blasphemy law on
all of Canada,” the petition states.
“If that happens, criticism of Islam would constitute
a speech crime in Canada,” it states, adding that this “kind of content-based, viewpoint-discriminatory
censorship is unacceptable in a Western liberal democracy.”
It seems to be no big deal to the police, ACLU,
ADL, B'nai Brith-types since it's not WASPs calling for the killings. The Imam must have brown privilege.
The former president of a student association that handed out books which
condoned wife beating is now pushing for anti-Islamophobia laws as a member of the Canadian parliament.
Her name is Iqra Khalid. She
was born in Pakistan and then moved to Canada in the 1990’s. Now she is a member of the Canadian Parliament where
she is pushing for anti-Islamophobia laws.
Following January 29's deadly shooting at a Quebec City mosque which killed six people and wounded eight, two suspects
were under arrest and according to press reports have been identified: one is a French-Canadian and the other was of Moroccan
heritage. One suspect was identified as Alexandre Bissonnette, a French-Canadian, the other as Mohamed Khadir, who
is of Moroccan heritage although his nationality was not immediately known.
Asked to comment on the election of Donald Trump, Canadian
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said he's not going to be "shy" about the fact he's a "proud feminist,"
believes "immigration is a source of strength" and "Muslim Canadians are an essential part of the success
of our country."
Despite a rousing speech at the Paris climate talks in 2015, Canada's
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has "betrayed" every one of the commitments he made, according to actor and activist
Jane Fonda.
"The lesson is we shouldn't
be fooled by good-looking Liberals," she said of the Canadian PM.
Pediatric surgeon and former cabinet minister Kellie Leitch is gaining support from across her nation placing her as
a surprise frontrunner to lead the opposition Conservative Party. Ms Leitch, like the US president-elect, is railing
against immigration and political elites and pushing a hard-right "Canadian values" platform. The 46-year-old
has answered rising discontent in Canada over the sluggish economy and the acceptance of 37,000 Syrian refugees. Fresh
polls show Leitch is ahead of about a dozen candidates in the Conservative leadership election scheduled to be held on May
27, 2017. The candidate chosen by party members will be their flag bearer for the October 2019 general election, against
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau's anit-White, Fidel Castro loving Liberals.
Alt-Right Flyers Invade Multicultural Canada by Fan Jun
A sequence of flyers posted in Toronto and inside mailboxes
in Richmond, BC, over the last weeks have occasioned a sequence of paroxysms of rage, totalitarian self-righteousness, and
hate crimes investigations across the second largest country of the world.
It all began on a quiet morning when a young
White male cuck saw a poster on a tree with the words "Hey, WHITE PERSON, wondering why only white countries have to
become 'multicultural'?" and "figured out that diversity only means 'less white people'?" This
man, an exemplary law abiding member of the most diverse and most harmonious city ever created in history, was "shocked
and disgusted" by these words, and immediately pulled down the flyers, and then notified the police about a potential
invasion of Canada by an Alt-Right army.
City councillor Jane Davis, who brags in her Twitter she is "working
with you to build our community" backed by a picture consisting of sixteen children of which only two are White, immediately
tweeted:
This hate is unacceptable in our City. Staff are removing the posters immediately and investigating who
is responsible.
She then called for more immigration to stop the possibility of any White male in the future posting
such "very disturbing, very worrisome" ideas.
And so it went for a few days, article after article, TV news
after TV news, with Toronto Police Const. Victor Kwong assuring the most harmonious community in human history that the Police
had "launched an investigation after speaking to several complainants about the posters."
The investigation
would also involve "taking samples" of the bacterial flyers "for analysis" in laboratories.
Even
a "spokesman for Toronto's Parks, Forestry and Recreation," Matthew Cutler, was "made aware" of the
flyers in case they were found across the forests and parks of Canada. He agreed that they would carry a thorough examination
of as many trees as possible, and that all the forestry agents were instructed to "immediately remove them" if they
saw them.
Rinaldo Walcott
CBC news announced a police investigation "after posters went up directing people
to 'pro-European' news sources" They consulted an expert on pro-European hatred, Rinaldo Walcott, director of
the Women and Gender Studies Institute at the University of Toronto. After much thinking, he came up with a brilliant analytical
conclusion:
Of course the American election has emboldened white nationalist groups in Toronto. Only time will
tell how far out of the shadows they will emerge.
You see, Walcott is an exemplary member of our harmonious multicultural
nation; all his writings have been about Black Like Who: Writing Black Canada, Contemporary Black Canadian Cultural Criticism,
etc. etc. You don't believe me, check his university page, it says with pride that:
in all of Rinaldo's
research and publication he focuses on Black cultural politics; histories of colonialism in the Americas, multiculturalism,
citizenship, and diaspora; gender and sexuality; and social, cultural and public policy.
And why not, how else are you
are going to create a harmonious Canada if not by eliminating pro-European ideas and establishing pro-Black ideas?
Nate
Erskine-Smith, the member of parliament for Beaches-East York, announced with solemn words and self-righteous indignation:
We are better than this. Ignorant, unacceptable and #NotMyCanada.
Even Marilyn Mayo, Research Fellow in ADL's
Center on Extremism, was asked to comment about this major course of events in Canada. She had no doubt these flyers were
"in favour of a politics that embraces either implicit or explicit racism or white supremacy," and that an Alt-Right
movement was now threatening the entire fabric of Canada's exemplary multicultural harmony.
The Huffington Post,
Toronto Star, Toronto Sun, and countless others would go on ad nauseum with similar stories, similar reactions, and similar
experts.
Then, a few days later, another massive shock hit the other side of the country: Alt-Right Pamphlets Come
to Richmond Targeting Chinese People. How could this be, how did White men manage to penetrate this stronghold of harmonious
multiculturalism, a city that is now majority Chinese, with Chinese commercial signs everywhere, and barely any audible English
on the streets?
One resident, "who feared possible retribution" by White soldiers if named by the Richmond
News said:
I was horrified, absolutely horrified. I thought, is this real? Oh my gosh, this is what's happening
in the United States right now. I just couldn't believe this was happening.
Don't worry, Cpl. Dennis Hwang assured
residents that
the Richmond RCMP will take all matters that may be hate or bias motivated very seriously. We are
currently investigating this incident.
"I'm pissed that someone thought this was acceptable," said another
resident. What the establishment found most unacceptable indeed was the way this poster "alludes to ethnic Chinese people
refusing to speak English and making housing prices unaffordable," and suggesting that "white people are being marginalized"
in such a successful example of multicultural diversity as Richmond.
Don't these White supremacists know that Richmond
is "the centre of a global demographic explosion virtually unprecedented in human history"? Can't they understand
that multiculturalism has worked in this city, "no other city in Canada has a population in which 62 per cent of permanent
residents are foreign born?"
Are they not aware that University of Victoria urban geographer David Chenyuan Lai
has counted more than "50 bustling Asian-themed malls and outlets"? Can't they see that giant houses called
"McMansions" are "steadily replacing" the boring "small bungalows" of White families?
How
could they possibly target the Chinese when Richmond, six years ago, as of 2011, finally became 54.6 percent Chinese, and
only 26.1 percent White? Is this not a major success signalling ever growing harmony?
Well, if pro-European men can't
see that this is a success, the establishment will ensure that it is, and so CEO Queenie Choo has announced that S.U.C.C.E.S.S.
will hold a massive forum in the new year "over anti-immigrant sentiment." S.U.C.C.E.S.S. is especially designed
"to assist new immigrants with settlement; provide counselling and support to families and individuals with personal
issues" and re-educating the White population into accepting without any racist complaints their demographic replacement
in Canada as the most successful thing that could ever happen for the sake of multicultural harmony.
How dare you Whites
put posters disrupting the incredible success of multicultural Canada! How dare you wonder why only White countries are being
forced to become racially diverse? How dare you question your marginalization? Tired of being called a racist if you question
this success? You bet we will call you a racist if you express "pro-European" views rather than our pro-Chinese
and pro-Black views. Posted at 16:18 7 C
PRO WHITE POSTERS DENOUNCED AS "HATE" What a nasty, constipated regime is the land of political correctness.
Carefully, examine the poster below. Do you see anything there about Whites being supreme or any attack on other races? No,
the poster simply ticks off some of the anti-White notions of political correctness.
However, various hysterics, including
two politicians are blaming Donald Trump (we`re pretty sure he didn`t post them) and denouncing them as `racists`and ``hate.
"'I was absolutely floored," (resident Kevin¸)Kerr said. He tweeted photo of the poster, saying he was
'disgusted by racists empowered by (Donald Trump).'
The signs were quickly denounced on social media by many,
while others questioned whether the poster was racist, in some cases citing free speech.
Ward 31 councilor Janet Davis
was notified of the sign and said city staff would be removing the posters.
'This hate is unacceptable in our city,'
Davis tweeted. 'Staff are removing the posters immediately and investigating who is responsible.'
Nate Erskine-Smith,
the member of parliament for Beaches-East York, also condemned the sign. 'We are better than this. Ignorant, unacceptable
and #NotMyCanada,' he tweeted.
Toronto Police spokesperson Victor Kwong said police have received many reports about
the signs and have taken them down.
'This report will be furthered to see whether or not it is a crime or not,'
Kwong said. 'We're looking into it.'`` Toronto Star, November 14, 2016)
And what is unacceptable, Sir:standing
up for White rights, not wanting to be blamed for the shortcomings of others or not wanting to be swamped by people of radically
different culture.
How pathetic! The Toronto Police Service actually has time to go around ripping down political signs
and now must decide whether expressing a political opinion is a `hate crime`.
The Trump Revolution can`t come to Canada
fast enough!
Donald Trump has focused repeated attention on the lying, hopelessly biased Mainstream Media or Lamestream
Media. To whom does the Star reporter go to find out about Alt-Right? A U.S. spokesman like Jamie Kelso of `The Trump Phenomenon
(a daily radio show on RBN, 9:00 p.m. nightly) or Jared Taylor of even me. No, the reporter goes to a mortal enemy of White
Identity and free speech, the Jewish lobby group, ADL.! ``'Marilyn Mayo, a research fellow at the Anti-Defamation League's
Center on Extremism, described the alt-right movement as "a loose network of people who promote white identity, and reject
mainstream conservatism in favour of a politics that embraces either implicit or explicit racism or white supremacy."
She is not surprised it has appeared in Canada.
Toronto city staff are investigating after signs targeting white
people 'sick of being blamed for all the world's problems' and urging them to 'join the alt-right' were
spotted around the city on Monday morning. Toronto city staff are investigating after signs targeting white people 'sick
of being blamed for all the world's problems' and urging them to 'join the alt-right' were spotted around
the city on Monday morning. (KEVIN KERR)
DISGRACEFUL GROSS NEGLIGENCE OF B.C. PREMIER AND B.C. GOVERNMENT Flyer circulated in Richmond by Immigration
Watch Canada
B.C. Premier Christy Clark who sat back and did virtually nothing as Metro Vancouver house prices soared
into the stratosphere is once more demonstrating that she is a Province-Wide "Disgrace".
She
has just proclaimed that a recent flyer circulated in Richmond is a "disgrace".
Now, dear me,
we like to be polite, but if anyone is to be summarily condemned for being a disgrace, it is Clark. Over and over for several
years , she was called on to intervene in Metro Vancouver's astronomic housing price crisis, but she and her government
as well as most other politicians of every party and at every level of government engaged in gross negligence.
They
claimed they did not have enough information to act, but experts have shown they had ample information to do something. Instead,
Clark took the advice of the corrupt real estate industry and let the real estate market go into a frenzy. The negligence
of her and the rest of the political class has created one of the most expensive housing markets in the world.
Clark's
government has introduced a 15% tax but the damage of their gross negligence will endure. This is a grossly unjust financial
burden for hundreds of thousands of Metro Vancouver residents. Unless a major economic crash occurs, that burden will last
far into the future both for renters now facing escalating rents and for home owners who are now saddled with huge mortgages.
Governments
which commit such crimes against their own citizens on such a basic need as shelter are not just true "disgraces"
. They are criminals and deserve to be treated as criminals.
It is hard to believe that Clark and all
the other politicians had not heard about the work of UBC Professor David Ley, whose book "Millionaire Migrants"
showed that relentless immigration was the major cause of astronomic house prices.
It is also hard to believe
that Clark was not aware of David Ley's revelation that there was an extremely high statistical correlation amounting
to cause and effect between immigration and Metros' high housing prices. Clark could have used Ley's research and
complained to Ottawa that Canada did not need almost all of the immigrants it was taking and that a dramatic reduction in
immigration was necessary, but she did not.
It is also hard to believe that Clark was not aware of David
Ley's revelations about a particular kind of immigration : the Business Immigrant Programme. That programme had resulted
in several hundred thousand Business Immigrants and their families coming to Metro Vancouver.
Ley also
showed that these wealthy people, most of whom were Chinese, did not fulfill their obligation to start businesses here and
employ Canadians. In fact, almost all of them and their families made it clear from the beginning that they were in Canada
to sit back, plunder and parasitize Canada.
It's now time for Canada to collect the huge amounts IN
BACK TAXES that it is owed by these people or to take measures to remove them.
It is also hard to believe
that Clark was unaware of the revelations of UBC Professor Daniel Hiebert. He stated these people were declaring income
at the level of some of the poorest areas in Canada. This meant that they were paying little if any Income Tax and undoubtedly
hiding their offshore earnings.
In other words, these big-money off-shore migrants were plundering and
parasitizing Canada's education, health and other Canadian infrastructure. For the sake of grossly negligent Clark, her
government and most other politicians, Hiebert prepared a map showing where many of these new arrivals were living. Almost
all were residing in the most expensive areas of Metro Vancouver in very expensive houses, some of which could be described
as mansions.
It is also hard to believe that Clark and her colleagues have not heard about the investigative
work done by journalists such as Douglas Todd, Kathy Tomlinson, Sam Shepherd and others who have demonstrated that our politicians
and Canada's Gatekeepers (FINTRAC, the CRA and Canada's Department of Immigration) have allowed hundreds of thousands
of immigrants as well as offshore speculators to abuse Canada's tax and immigration system in order to launder dirty money
from places like China.
Former Richmond Mayor Greg Halsey-Brandt was the first of only a few politicians
to state that Canada was being cheated. The vast majority of politicians have been silent and have done nothing. The cheaters
have interpreted politicians' silence to mean that politicians approve of tax evasion or are afraid of offending the cheaters
and fearful of endangering votes from the cheaters.
Here are some big questions for Premier Gross Negligence
Clark to answer:
Does she intend to ask the police investigate UBC Professors David Ley and Daniel Hiebert,
and journalists like Douglas Todd, Kathy Tomlinson and Sam Shepherd for hate crimes? That is, for revealing facts that grossly
negligent, politically correct politicians hate to hear? For their shining light on the foul if not brazenly criminal actions
of Wealthy Chinese cheaters? For daring to point to the Asian elephant in the room?
It is time that we
forced the cheaters to pay for their tax evasion, overturned their table and cast them and their political enablers in Victoria
out of B.C.'s TEMPLE. For sensible immigration policies for the 21st century
Second Nations: Justin
Trudeau And The Fall of Anglo-Canada
As most Canadians realize, Liberal Party leader Justin Trudeau became prime
minister of our country as of October 19th, 2015. What is less understood, however, are the social ramifications of this
federal election. Lost among the photo opportunities, international grandstanding and playboy showmanship is the fact that
our prime minister is working an agenda to alter the destiny of our nation. Trudeau’s ascension to his political throne marks the beginning of the end of what is commonly referred to as
English Canada. It is more than obvious that Canada’s national heritage — in particular its English and French
identity — is entirely irrelevant to Trudeau, his cabinet, and more than likely the entire Liberal caucus. Over the
course of his first year in office, Justin has yet to reference, recognize, or even speak of Canada’s English and
French cultural heritage — an ominous sign, indeed.
As we prepare to celebrate the 150th anniversary of
the founding of Canada, it is likely the event will also represent the final chapter of our 150- year era of European-derived
governance. First-past-the-post, a voting system of British derivation, may well go the way of the dinosaur. No referendum,
no public approval — in other words, entirely representative of a brand of pseudo-democracy only a Trudeau government
has the nerve to impose. The Liberal’s gender parity initiative, and no doubt its forthcoming offspring “ethnic”
parity, have introduced social engineering to government. Furthermore, the result of Trudeau’s bold assertion that
Canada “has no dominant culture” serves as an effective catalyst for the dissolution of Anglo-Canada. Mass third world immigration will resolve the demographic component. Multicultural policy will ensure ideological success, while rampant political correctness will muzzle those daring to oppose the agenda.
In basic terms, our prime minister has decided that “international”
Canada will take it from here. That is, Justin Trudeau has decided — and not the Canadian people. Oddly enough, it
was Justin’s father who in the very same manner made a decision to cancel our bi-cultural identity and replace it
with official multiculturalism. No public consultation. Again, no referendum. Ironically, the very same dynamic is putting
the final nail in the cultural coffin of English Canada — namely, the will of yet another maverick prime minister
by the name of Trudeau.
So what of our future? We begin to gain insight when considering the Liberal government’s
fervent dedication to the Nation of Islam. One billion dollars to import and fund Muslim refugees. The denial of any association between terrorism and Islam. A refusal to label the mass murder of Christians in the Middle
East as genocide. The reinstatement of Canadian citizenship for convicted terrorists.
Next up, the appeasement
of South Asian communities — mainly in the province of Ontario. Doubling family reunification numbers. Incessant pandering
to the Sikh community. Fast-tracking first generation and migrant South Asian politicians into positions of power.
With Trudeau’s recent trip to China, the picture is now complete. In a manner not unlike a political second coming,
the Chinese media have gone Lady Gaga over our global playboy of a prime minister. Six new visa offices created. Over a
billion dollars worth of new business partnerships. Integration into China’s state-owned banking industry. Approvals
for their government to buy up Canadian resources and real estate.
All the while, Canada’s economic
vital signs have been dropping like a barometer on a frosty Nunavut morning. Within Trudeau-land, fiscal stability is inconsequential.
What is far more important is that the international community have their globalist hero. Unfortunately for our country’s
growing social conservative movement, heroism and Justin Trudeau remain entirely incongruous.
By way of our Liberal
government, within a single generation all traditional components of Canadian society will be sublimated. Our official languages
will be rendered meaningless. The poor will become the destitute, as lower income Canadians morph into an underclass previously
reserved for our First Nations communities. All the while, wealthy of the third world will join rich Canadians to form a
post-modern Canadian elite, as the lower and middle classes continue their downward slide toward full marginalization within
Canadian society.
Sound far-fetched? We can only hope. However, history tells us it is never a prudent idea to
underestimate the power of globalism in the hands of a Trudeau. This we have already witnessed in father Pierre’s
reverence for debt accumulation and socialism. After all, it was no mere coincidence that Fidel Castro was a pall bearer
at his funeral.
So into the great unknown Canadians go, unaware our society is in its most transformative stage
since the founding of our nation in 1867. This is, however, quite understandable — between work, marriage, children,
mortgages and bill payments these folks simply do not have the time to focus upon such trivialities as the demise of their
national heritage.The fact that to raise even the smallest objection results in accusations of racism, bigotry and xenophobia
keeps home-grown Canadians in check.
So it’s off to Tent City to assume the position of the “Second
Nations” peoples of Canada. Home ownership — at least in cosmopolitain centres like Toronto and Vancouver—
is now reserved for the wealthy of the world. Dozens of Canadian municipalities are today third world mini-states. Naturally, our Liberal government are accelerating
the process though an uplift in immigration quotas. “Old Stock”Canada — a euphemism for white Canadians
— are now the target of affirmative action — meaning they are being forced out of government positions
for the heinous crime of, well, being white. In diversity-speak, this is called “equality.”
Yes,
it is game over — at least for English Canada. Perhaps the greatest irony is that within a supposedly democratic nation,
not a single Canadian ever had a say in the matter. Under the politically correct spin of a Trudeau government, this is
what is referred to as “democracy.”
The question, which was put to a sample of residents on September 6, asked “Knowing what you do
now, if there were another emergency evacuation order in High River, as there was during the 2013 floods, would you trust
the RCMP to protect your home and property?”
Thirty-nine percent (39%) said they would not
trust the RCMP, seventeen percent (17%) said they were doubtful, and only forty-four (44%) said they would trust the RCMP.
“More
than one-third (38%) of the sample have clearly lost their faith in the RCMP. That’s impressive!” says Gary
Mauser, Professor Emeritus at the Beedie School of Business and the Institute for Urban Canadian Research Studies at Simon
Fraser University. “And another 17% are doubtful. Less than half the sample trusts the RCMP.”
During
the flooding members of the RCMP kicked in hundreds of doors, causing $2.3 million in damages to more than 2,000 homes.
Entering these homes and illegally confiscating firearms led to a special investigation by the Commission for Public Complaints
Against the RCMP.
The Commission’s final report found that “…the RCMP wrongly seized firearms
which were safely stored. In addition, the Commission found that the RCMP failed to report the seizures to a justice as
required by the Criminal Code.”
This Site may
contain links and pointers to other Internet sites, resources, and sponsors of the Site. Links to and from the Site to other
third-party sites, maintained by third parties, do not constitute an endorsement by us of any third parties, the third-party
sites or the contents thereof.
You're not being tolerant, inclusive, nor anti-racist.
You're being invaded, colonized and replaced.
Powered by Earthlink
News items and photos republished
under Fair Use Doctrine of the Internet. Global Gulag dot US makes no money from advertising and does not request financial support from our readers. Items posted are for informational and educational
purposes only.
Note to visitors to Global Gulag dot US: As of February
12 I will no longer maintain this version of my website due to Earthlink no longer supporting Trellix, which I have used
for years to create and update Global Gulag.us -- However, I will continue the site using Word Press. Please carefully
note the URL of this site [https://www.globalgulag.us/globalgulag/index.html] and that it is longer than the URL for www.globalgulag.us
. Most search engines will now go to the Word Press site, which will continue to be updated. Please continue
to follow Global Gulag, both the old one here and the new one. I value your loyalty and interest in this site. --
[webmaster]