Global Gulag

Home | Videos and Photos | British "News" | Statue Vandalism, Hatred & Removal | Why a border wall? | Opinion-Editorial | Anti-Trump Activities | Hollywood Propaganda | Smuggling & Trafficking | Canada Genocide | Springbok Newsletter | Anarchy | Economic Vampires | SHTF Watch | Europe Invasion & Colonization | German "News" | Progressivism Revealed | Anti-White Racism | About Global Gulag.US | The New South Africa | Old radios on display at SFO airport | Rhodesia / Zimbabwe | Guest Opinions | Suggested Reading | Border Watch | Politicians Lying | Un-American Activities | Invasion Watch USA | Sedition & Treason | Patriots Rising | Escaping Zimbabwe | Zimbabwe Conservation Task Force

Suggested Reading

Did He Just Say That? A Review of Someone Has to Say It: The Hidden History of How America Was Lost by Tom Kawczynski

Do you ever wonder what happened to America? Do you wonder how we went from a stable, prosperous land in the 1950s — a land whose cities were the jewels of the world with neighborhoods where no one locked their doors and an education system that was second-to-none — to a country where it isn’t safe to walk the streets at night, and where huge numbers of people graduate high school unable to read, but fully convinced that White heterosexual men (particularly those of the working class) are StupidEvilRacistSexistNazisWhoWannaKillSixMillionJews? Do you wonder where strident feminism came from? How about the “trans-gender” agenda? Do you wonder who’s behind the rise of militant black racism or open borders? Or why radical red guard-style communists, masquerading as “anti-fascists”, are free to roam our streets attacking any White person, they deem “racist”, or “sexist”, or “homophobic”, etc., with relative impunity? In short, have you wondered how we lost America?

In January of this year, Tom Kawczynski found himself at the epicenter of a manufactured national media firestorm designed to force him out of his position as the town manager of Jackman, a small community in rural northern Maine, for daring to ask these questions. Jackman’s loss was America’s gain. His forced resignation gave him the time to answer these questions and more.

The Liberal/Left Tries to Shame/Guilt Everyone Associated with President Trump

Recently there’s been an upsurge in the left engaging in public displays of shaming and shunning public figures associated with the President Trump. Maxine “Impeach 45” Waters famously wants Trump allies to be shamed wherever they go—gas stations, department stores, and even their homes.

And the trend is catching on. Sarah Huckabee Sanders and Scott Pruitt were unceremoniously asked to leave restaurants. Kirstjen Nielsen (at her home) and Mitch McConnell and his wife, Transportation Secretary Elaine Chao got similar treatment. Jared and Ivanka have resorted to working out in a darkened gym to avoid the harassment. And then there’s the woman who confronted Steve Bannon in a bookstore, calling him a “piece of trash.” Right now it’s everyone from Kellyanne Conway to Stephen Miller facing hecklers wherever they go.

Sometimes it edges into violence. Breitbart tabulated 304 incidents of harassment or violence against Trump supporters since the election, all basically ignored by the media. Most of the victims are non-celebrities, like the teenager who was attacked by a Latino adult throwing soda at him and stealing his MAGA hat. Most pathetically, a woman who thanked Eric Trump for raising $16 million for St. Jude Hospital was subjected to “unreal hate” on social media. The trend is clear.

Review: A Fair Hearing: The Alt-Right in the Words of Its Members and Leaders

Fair Hearing: The Alt-Right in the Words of Its Members and Leaders
George T. Shaw (ed)
Arktos, 2018

“After absorbing the initial impact the alt-right remained intact and forward-oriented, no nearer or further from its goals, but now more serious and matured.” Thus remarks Evan McLaren, former Executive Director of the National Policy Institute, in a profound personal account of Charlottesville and its immediate aftermath. McLaren’s account is one of 21 essays which together comprise the latest offering from Arktos: A Fair Hearing: The Alt-Right in the Words of Its Members and Leaders. His thoughts offer a succinct summary of the broader contents of the volume — the essays here are representative of a movement in some respects battered and bruised from legal and media entanglements, but also remarkably clear-headed and ideologically robust. Heightened media attention devoted to the Alt-Right, which peaked in 2017 and not always for the better, has been intense and fluctuating, dating probably from Hillary Clinton’s September 2016 “Basket of Deplorables” speech. At first this attention seemed oriented towards crowning an Alt-Right leader who could then be used as a focal point for both defining and maligning the movement. It now seems absurd that Milo Yiannopoulos was the first pick, though he gradually faded into obscurity as the 2016 NPI conference, along with the “Whitefish” incident, brought Andrew Anglin and then Richard Spencer to national prominence. Arguably, it was Whitefish that first offered an opportunity for the media to introduce fear of the movement, rather than simply horror or disgust, into its narrative. Tanya Gersh, one of the key protagonists in that affair, declared she was not being harassed by trolls or deplorables, but “terrorists.” The texture of media coverage quickly changed in the aftermath, absorbing the language introduced by Gersh and her backers in the Southern Poverty Law Center, and culminating on August 11–12, 2017 in Charlottesville, Virginia.

Nelson Mandela's legacy hijacked to help West sell liberal agenda

The theft and distortion of Nelson Mandela’s legacy by champions of
Western liberalism has and continues to be both sickening and obscene to
behold.
Libya hovers into sharp relief

Just how obscene, is reflected by the sight of former US President
Barack Obama delivering the annual Nelson Mandela lecture in
Johannesburg on July 17, the 100th anniversary of the giant of the
anti-Apartheid revolution’s birth.

This event has been held annually in South Africa since 2003, organized
by the Nelson Mandela Foundation. According to the foundation’s website
“global leaders have used the lecture to raise topical issues affecting
South Africa, Africa and the rest of the world.”  Instantly arriving on
the back of these words, however, given Obama’s participation as the
event’s star act this year, comes anger and a crippling sense of irony –
cruel irony – as ‘Libya’ hovers into sharp relief.


Not only was the former US president key in turning the North African
country from a functioning state with a ‘high human development rank’,
according to the UN, into a manifestation of hell on earth, but Libya’s
murdered leader, Muammar Gaddafi, provided significant material aid to
Mandela and the anti-apartheid struggle in South Africa when at its most
intense. This was way before it achieved the status of cause celebre in
the West, when Washington and its allies were doing their utmost to lend
legitimacy to the country’s brutal apartheid government and state
institutions.

Mandela, to his credit, never forgot Gaddafi’s support and solidarity,
taking the opportunity of a public appearance alongside then US
President Bill Clinton in 1998 to declare that in reference to Gaddafi’s
Libya “moral authority dictates that we should not abandon those who
helped us in the darkest hour."

The unvarnished truth when it comes to Obama’s connection to Mandela is
that the only thing they ever had in common – apart, that is, from the
Nobel Prize they both received – was the color of his skin. Other than
that Obama stands as a political and moral dwarf compared to a man who
endured untold privation and hardship during the struggle against
Apartheid, including 27 years in prison.
Opportunism of champions of Western liberalism, such as Obama

No matter, for champions of Western liberal opportunism have long
occupied the slot in the dictionary where shame should reside. And there
is no better example of it than Obama’s 2013 pilgrimage to Robben
Island, where Mandela served most of the long years spent incarcerated
alongside other heroes of the struggle for freedom for black South Africa.

President Obama’s visit to the notorious prison island in the year of
Mandela’s death came at a time when inmates at the equally notorious US
detention facility at Guantanamo in Cuba were engaged in a hunger
strike, demanding an end to the harsh treatment and conditions of their
own incarceration. This was the same Guantanamo Obama had pledged to
close on his first days in office. The record shows, of course, that not
only did America’s first black president fail to close Guantanamo on his
first days in office, he did not close it on any day of the two terms he
served.

<continued at link>

Not a Country; Not Even a Team

Mr. Chang and Mr. Tristan call themselves “American,” but what does that mean? “American” no longer has a racial connotation. It no longer has a linguistic connotation; a declaration by lawyer Aaron Schlossberg that Americans should speak English made him a media target. Outlets such as Time tell us that illegal immigrants calling themselves “Dreamers” are “new Americans,” so you can be an American without even being a citizen.

The United States may be the “sole superpower” but American identity means nothing more than participation in an economy. Today, appeals to America identity, such as “that’s not who we are” or “those aren’t our values” are usually used to tell us we are not morally allowed to act in our own interests. Reporters and watchdogs look down their noses at even the bloodless civic nationalism represented by American symbols. Millions of “Americans” show no respect for the national flag and don’t support the national team.

No one is opposed to nationalism—except in historically white nations. Then it becomes “populism” or even “racism.”

Review: Travels in Cultural Nihilism - Some Essays

Wakanda, the New Black Homeland

It seems likely Black Panther will be eventually incorporated into school curriculums as a form of cultural reparations, teaching young Americans what Africa would have looked like were it not for European interference. Some public school students are already getting advance screenings of the film. This attempt to boost the already unrealistically high self-esteem of blacks is likely to be effective. Unfortunately, it will also fuel the pathological sense of grievance blacks have against white people for supposedly creating all of their problems.

It’s hard not to see this as intentional. James Baldwin knew even the most illiterate white person was related to Dante, Shakespeare, Michelangelo, Aeschylus, da Vinci, Rembrandt, and Racine in a way he never could be. But now blacks have been given an attractive myth, being told they are honorary citizens of Wakanda in a way whites can never be. And as blacks are provided a fantasy of power and success, our own people are indoctrinated to feel shame and guilt about the deeds our ancestors actually accomplished.

Jorge Ramos and the Meaning of Treason

Under almost every system, treason is punishable by death because it endangers not just citizens, but the very principles of authority and responsibility on which society rests. Thus, what a society considers “treason” tells us what that society values.

It’s therefore interesting that Jorge Ramos, the Mexican-born Spanish-language news anchor, is accusing Republicans of wanting the so-called “Dreamers” to commit something like treason.

What Republicans are asking from the Dreamers is like treason. When they say they want to end “chain migration”, they are telling them: we’ll legalize you but I’ll deport your parents and siblings. When someone mistreats your parents, you’ll remember it all your life.

— JORGE RAMOS (@jorgeramosnews) February 12, 2018

Of course, what Republicans are asking of the “Dreamers” is to put their loyalty to this country—the country we are constantly (and inaccurately) told is the “only country they have ever known”—over the interests of foreigners. This is, after all, what any country would ask of those who want to immigrate. And yet Mr. Ramos’s reaction is an implicit admission that the propaganda line being used to argue for amnesty—that “Dreamers” are simply undocumented Americans—is false. To accuse Mr. Ramos and his ideological allies of “dual loyalty” would be to understate the case; he appears to have little loyalty to the United States at all.

Mexifornia Today, Meximerica Tomorrow?

Victor Davis Hanson, Mexifornia: A State of Becoming, Encounter Books, 2003, 150 pp., $21.95.

Victor Davis Hanson, a classicist at California State University, Fresno, brings a fifth-generation Californian’s perspective on the state’s slide into Third-World “Mexifornia.” He grew up in Selma in the San Joaquin Valley where he still runs a family farm, and has witnessed the steady dispossession of “Anglos” (though Prof. Hanson is of Swedish extraction).

<snip>

As a child in the 1950s and “60s, Prof. Hanson was one of few whites in Selma. Most of his classmates were legal Mexican immigrants, along with a remnant of the white “Okies” who still did farm work. He says there was some mild racial tension, but that a strong assimilationist ethic meant everyone was American, regardless of race. He even claims to feel most comfortable “with the people I grew up with, a population of mostly Mexicans, Mexican-Americans and whites who were raised with non-whites.”

It was the disappearance of Prof. Hanson’s California of the 1950s that prompted him to write Mexifornia. At 150 pages and without footnotes, the book is a personal reflection of the changes one man has seen over the last 40 years.

Today, Selma is almost entirely Mexican. La Raza-typeracialism has replaced assimilation, and Prof. Hanson deals almost daily with the problems — unseen by most whites — of mass immigration. Illegals use his farm as a garbage dump. He regularly finds used diapers, plastic toys, old magazines, television sets, vermin-infested sofas and beds, and even junk cars on his property. His most bizarre discovery was a 1950s camping trailer (no plates or registration, of course) abandoned in front of his house. It was filled with broken furniture, tree limbs, garbage, clothes, and old newspapers. The tires were flat and the trailer was impossible to move. After three weeks, the county finally removed the monstrosity with a skip loader and a dump truck.

 

What Was Verifiably Great About America: Fragments Of A Memoir Set To A Musical Soundtrack

Having been born in a coal and steel company town but destiny delivered, as an adult, to reside, during extended intervals, in the East and West Coast cities of Los Angeles and New York City, and, at present, the continent of Europe, I have come to conclude, people born into situations providing economic advantage, both liberals and conservatives alike, experience difficulty, more often than not, envisaging the lives of those born into a labouring class existence. Worse, a wilful obtuseness, in combination with a supercilious posture is, all too often, evinced, by reflex, towards those scorned as "hillbillies," "trailer trash," and "genetic retreads."

American Education is a War on Whites

American Education is a War on Whites

December 10, 2017 - 28 Comments
Edmund Connelly, Ph. D.

Is there really any use in trying to show that education in America is firmly in the hands of enemies of the White race? Probably not, since it is so obvious. Plus it has been well addressed already time and again, including by gifted writer F. Roger Devlin, who delivered an address six years ago at the fourth annual meeting of the H.L. Mencken Club. VDARE.com's editor, Peter Brimelow, called Devlin's presentation "a searing account of how the historic American nation has been, in effect, decapitated - its higher education facilities are now entirely in the hands of hostile forces."

In his talk, "Higher Education: The Impossibility Of Reform," Devlin began by noting that by now there must be "a sizeable class of academically trained non-leftists for whom there is essentially no place in the contemporary academy." This sense of not being welcome has now trickled down from potential teachers to White male students as well. "Young men," Devlin observes, "are staying away to avoid what their enemies would describe as a ‘hostile learning environment.'"

Not surprisingly, the knowledge that all levels of American education show hatred toward White males - either implicitly or explicitly - is the reason that the younger cohort of what constitutes today's Alt-Right addresses the topic so often. I can think of no better example than Mike Enoch, main host of the "Daily Shoah" on The Right Stuff alternative media platform. He and his fellow hosts speak from personal experience when discussing the hostile environment they encountered in school as White non-Jewish males. Typically, this is from kindergarten on up.

Chris Hedges: Elites "Have No Credibility Left"

On Monday, WSWS International Editorial Board Chairman David North interviewed Chris Hedges, the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, author, lecturer and former New York Times correspondent. Among Hedges’ best-known books are War is a Force That Gives Us Meaning, The Death of the Liberal Class, Empire of Illusion: the End of Literacy and the Triumph of Spectacle, Days of Destruction, Days of Revolt, which he co-wrote with the cartoonist Joe Sacco, and Wages of Rebellion: the Moral Imperative of Revolt.

In an article published in Truthdig September 17, titled “The Silencing of Dissent,” Hedges referenced the WSWS coverage of Google’s censorship of left-wing sites and warned about the growth of “blacklisting, censorship and slandering dissidents as foreign agents for Russia and purveyors of ‘fake news.’”

Hedges wrote that “the Department of Justice called on RT America and its ‘associates’ - which may mean people like me - to register under the Foreign Agent Registration Act. No doubt, the corporate state knows that most of us will not register as foreign agents, meaning we will be banished from the airwaves. This, I expect, is the intent.”

North’s interview with Hedges began with a discussion of the significance of the anti-Russia campaign in the media.

COLUMBUS DAY IS A CELEBRATION OF WESTERN CIVILIZATION

October 12 is for celebrating the 525th anniversary of Columbus’ discovery of America, for on that day in 1492, the Great Admiral landed on Guanahani (now known as San Salvador or Watlings) island in the Bahamas.

We commemorate this as a true discovery in contrast to all the claims of Vikings, Chinese, Irish, and others who supposedly came earlier – for once and only after  Columbus discovered America, it stayed discovered.

Unfortunately, Columbus Day is for most Americans just an excuse for a three-day weekend – which is why it’s a holiday today, Monday October 9.

What it should be is a commemoration and celebration of  Western Civilization – which is why the Left hates Columbus and his holiday.

Jefferson and the Declaration: Anglo-Saxon to the Core

Race and the American Identity

The Road to Oblivioun

Paul Craig Roberts Warns "The World Is Going Down With Trump"

As David Stockman writes, Trump "is up against a Deep State/Dem/Neocon/mainstream media prosecution" and "has no chance of survival short of an aggressive offensive" against those working to destroy him. But there is no Trump offensive, "because the man is clueless about what he is doing in the White House and is being advised by a cacophonous coterie of amateurs and nincompoops. So he has no action plan except to impulsively reach for his Twitter account."

Our president twitters while he and Earth itself are pushed toward destruction.

A deep, dark reading of poignant insight... https://orionmagazine.org/article/dark-ecology/

Why the Future Doesn't Need us

A must-listen-to radio show about the plight of all indigenous peoples in nations everywhere:

KGNU's Cal Huss debuts on Metro in conversation with Professor Glenn Morris.  Morris is representing Red Fawn Fallis, Standing Rock Water Protector facing Federal charges.

http://www.kgnu.org/metro/5/2/2017

Immigration and Human Nature

F. Roger Devlin, American Renaissance, January 2011

Byron M. Roth, The Perils of Diversity, Washington Summit Publishers, 2010, 577 pp, $29.95.

The seismic shift now transforming the demographics of Europe and the United States is likely to leave a more permanent mark on our civilization than even the two world wars of the last century. The survivors of those conflicts returned to a life that was poorer than before, but otherwise much the same. This is never the case when one ethnic group displaces another. Barring wide-spread violence, the effects of large-scale immigration are irreversible. Byron Roth is therefore right to note in The Perils of Diversity that our current pattern of immigration is therefore “of world historical significance that will affect future generations for centuries to come.”

American universities that receive government funding (that is to say, virtually all of them) have “Institutional Review Boards” that approve or block research involving human subjects. Prof. Roth points out that most faculty members who serve on these boards are openly hostile to research that might reveal racial differences, often on the grounds that the results might get into the “wrong” hands.

Hate speech laws restrict public debate. Canadian journalist Mark Steyn notes that if an American writer approaches a publisher with a book criticizing immigration, he will be reminded that it may be illegal to sell it in Canada, and there goes 10 percent of the North American market. French and German translation rights cannot be sold because the book may run afoul of European xenophobia legislation, and a British edition may be impossible because libel laws are so lax that anyone mentioned unfavorably may be able to shut down sales. The result is that such a book may never reach the public, because it may no longer make economic sense to publish it.

Philanthropic foundations use their wealth and influence to direct public discussion into narrow channels. They sponsor publications and conferences under color of a disinterested concern but, as Prof. Roth explains, no one who speaks honestly about the facts of race will be sponsored as a “qualified expert.” Research on IQ goes unfunded, while millions are available for studies of “racism.” The Ford Foundation, in particular, has showered money on MALDEF, La Raza, the ACLU, and dozens of other pro-immigration groups.

 

California and the End of White America

A future America in which both whites and all other ethnic groups see themselves as minorities will be far different from our traditional majority-white/minority-black society. Since the 1960′s, the deepening ideological decay of the American melting pot, especially among the journalists and intellectuals who shape our thoughts, has transformed our official self-image from that of a nation of individuals living in a common culture into that of a nation of groups arrayed against one another in an ethnic spoils system. Multiculturalism and “diversity” thoroughly dominate our nation’s schools and politics and public discourse, encouraging minorities to exercise influence through the mobilization of ethnic or racial grievance. Under this framework, the rise of a similar ethnic-grievance movement among America’s emerging white minority is likely, perhaps inevitable...

As the first major state to face the political reality of a shrinking white minority, California has become the laboratory of America’s ethnic future...

Aristotle on Immigration, Diversity, and Democracy

Aristotle is greatly concerned with the preservation of civil peace in the city-state. One of the most common causes of “faction” and civil war, he says, was the unhappy consequences of unassimilated immigration and the consequent diversity. Aristotle’s prose is perfectly clear:

Heterogeneity of stocks may lead to faction – at any rate until they have had time to assimilate. A city cannot be constituted from any chance collection of people, or in any chance period of time. Most of the cities which have admitted settlers, either at the time of their foundation or later, have been troubled by faction. For example, the Achaeans joined with settlers from Troezen in founding Sybaris, but expelled them when their own numbers increased; and this involved their city in a curse. At Thurii the Sybarites quarreled with the other settlers who had joined them in its colonization; they demanded special privileges, on the ground that they were the owners of the territory, and were driven out of the colony. At Byzantium the later settlers were detected in a conspiracy against the original colonists, and were expelled by force; and a similar expulsion befell the exiles from Chios who were admitted to Antissa by the original colonists. At Zancle, on the other hand, the original colonists were themselves expelled by the Samians whom they admitted. At Apollonia, on the Black Sea, factional conflict was caused by the introduction of new settlers; at Syracuse the conferring of civic rights on aliens and mercenaries, at the end of the period of the tyrants, led to sedition and civil war; and at Amphipolis the original citizens, after admitting Chalcidian colonists, were nearly all expelled by the colonists they had admitted. (1303A13)

Thus, immigration of different peoples was a common source of conflict, often leading to civil war and concluding with the ethnic cleansing of either the native peoples or the invaders.

Here are a few articles on our President, the progressive left, and
deconstructionist media. They serve to explain the hatred directed
toward our President.



The Stepford Americans, by Dave Merrick, Canada Free Press, January 31, 2017
http://canadafreepress.com/article/the-stepford-americans

Excerpts:
What is going on right now is just downright weird-into-evil. And the
shots currently being fired at Trump - both the hateful insults as
well as the death threats - are unprecedented in the history of our nation...

CBS, NBC, ABC, PBS, etc., etc. have spent the past sixty years
shaping opinion by bending the appearance of truth before all the
millions of people who now live their lives in the fantasy world that
began as 'entertainment'. When someone like a fog-busting Trump comes
along, you've got to get the camera off of him. And because you can't
do that now that he is president, you've got to take him out entirely...



America's 2016 Declaration Of Independence, by Dave Merrick, Canada
Free Press, February 22, 2017
http://canadafreepress.com/article/americas-2016-declaration-of-independence

  liberal news-media and entertainment have for decades been
progressively shaping the attitudes of their consumer-audiences in
priming them for whoever will buy their mesmerized allegiance. And
now, as a result, our President is the TARGET of the most dangerous
group of EXTREMISTS on earth: our liberal press,
television/entertainment. And through their actions and 'journalism',
who can deny that they have issued what is tantamount to a deadly
fatwa on our president...

Working Americans - the nose-to-the-grindstone, beat-up taxpayers who
have been underwriting Obama's father's dreams - finally had had
enough. And they went and did what ABC, NBC, CBS, CNN, et al. never
dreamed of: They put their foot down and shouted a resounding "HELL, NO!"...

What most infuriates big media/press, etc., is that President Trump
is quite obviously not afraid of them...



Deconstruction of America has stopped, by Rolf Yungclas, Canada Free
Press, January 31, 2017
http://canadafreepress.com/article/deconstruction-of-america-has-stopped

The Left is freaking out because they've lost control in their effort
to make this a nation run by a Party and not a Constitution

Meanwhile, as the Left protests the existence of a non-Leftist
government, they are showing us that they consider the Constitutional
process optional. As long as their Party gets elected, our
Constitutional system is commendable. But put them out of power in a
major way and the goal becomes shutting down the Constitutional
process and imposing their will on the rest of us...

If immigration can't become, in effect, open immigration, then all
efforts to crack down on illegal immigration are considered
opposition to all immigrants and must be fiercely opposed...

And the ultimatum continues. Everything on President Trump's agenda
must be opposed, so come up with an argument why each item will cause
untold evil, and boycott, protest and disrupt wherever and whenever possible.

Some say a coup is in progress. I call it the Cold Civil War. The
forces of destruction have been deposed by the election of Donald
Trump and are trying everything short of armed revolt.

The cold coup d'etat had taken place under Obama but was unable to
consolidate its hold by turning the military into the armed forces of
the Left and by stopping the election of a Republican President for
the third consecutive time (and the final one, I would say).

Now, facing defeat, all they can do is try to sabotage the
restoration of our republic and multi-party government...

Enter President Donald J. Trump: A comatose nation has been revived
and is undergoing physical therapy in preparation for return to a
normal life. Once we get beyond the boycott of Trump administration
nominees we can get back to functioning as a great nation.

The Democrat Party-induced protests will fade, as did the anti-Tea
Party protests, Operation Wall Street, and Black Lives Matter. ISIS
will be put on the run, illegal immigration will be brought under
control, and the shackles will be taken off of economic growth. It's
going to be quite a ride, America, so fasten your seatbelt and
prepare for takeoff!...

The American Church Has Become An Instrument of Globalist Oppression

When Does a Modern Country Become a Third World Country?

When does a First World country become a Third World country? The better question is, how many third world immigrants can a modern country take on until they become the newest Third World country? This is why in the 1880’s, at the height of America’s largest legal immigration period, American law reflected the fact that the country would control the number of immigrants and the origin of the immigrants would be limited by a quota system. Further, the absence of communicable disease was a requirement for entry as was the absence of serious criminal behavior in the background of the immigrant as much as could be determined.

Today’s churches and their “immigration outreach services” have total disdain for the welfare of the country, as a whole, as they facilitate law-breaking behavior to the overall detriment of American citizens. The FBI has stated, for example, that one in ten immigrants from the Middle East could be expected to be radicalized. This is a euphemism for terrorist potentialities.

Why would any organization, even a church, advocate for the entry of these people without proper screening? Are we to assume that the Lutheran church is just fine with the events of Orlando, San Bernardino and 9/11? If so, this is why I want nothing to do with the modern American church.


Contact us: webmaster@globalgulag.us

This Site may contain links and pointers to other Internet sites, resources, and sponsors of the Site. Links to and from the Site to other third-party sites, maintained by third parties, do not constitute an endorsement by us of any third parties, the third-party sites or the contents thereof. 

Selous_Scouts.jpg
Rhodesian British-South African Defense Forces in 1965

You're not being tolerant. You're not being inclusive.  You're not being anti-racist.  You're being conquered.

Powered by Earthlink

News items and photos republished under Fair Use Doctrine of the Internet.  Global Gulag dot US makes no money from advertising and does not request financial support from our readers.  Items posted are for informational and educational purposes only.

Add 300,000 to Site Counter for correct number of site visitors. Counter was zeroed by glitch or malicious prankster when it reached 300K.  [Webmaster]