If this is the budget deal we get when Republicans control the House, the Senate and the presidency, there’s no
point in ever voting for a Republican again.
Not only is there no funding for a wall, but — thanks to the deft
negotiating skills of House Speaker Paul Ryan — the bill actually prohibits money from being spent on a wall.
At a CYA press conference on Tuesday, Trump’s ridiculously chipper budget director, Mick Mulvaney, described the
bill’s prohibition on building a wall as a MAJOR win. (At least Mulvaney said it in English, unlike his all-Spanish
True, there will be no wall. But the Democrats graciously agreed to allow the administration to fix
broken parts of any existing fences on up to 40 miles of our 3,000 mile border.
RT: FBI Director James Comey also described Russia “the greatest threat” to
US democracy. What are your thoughts about that?
AM: I think that in America some of the greatest
threats to their democracy is, first of all, the two-party system which is actually a sham in a sense that it doesn’t
matter who you vote for, the same government administration will get in. And the fact that most of the candidates who are
put up for election to president in the US tend to be very heavily backed by big lobby organizations, by Wall Street. So,
vested interests tend to be running a very corporatists state in America.
statements, views and opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
those of RT nor of Global Gulag US.
Reader comments from Occidental
Dissent article on President Trump's first 100 days
in White House . . .
John Taylor MAY 1, 2017
AT 12:06 AM The only one to call Pres. Trump's first 100 days a success is Trump himself. - Promise to
eliminate Obama Care and replace it - failure - promise to indict Hillary - Failure. She and her husband are good people - re-open 9/11 investigation. Failure - Open dialogue with Putin. Failure. We are on the brink of war with Russia
over Ukraine, Crimea and Syria. - Tear up trade agreements. Failure. One is in the works that is worse than TPP - Dialogue with China. We are on the brink of war in the S. China sea. - Mass immigration. Business as usual. Same
as Obama program. UPS planes arrive at US airports at midnight to avoid public exposure.
are watching an expansion of the last Nobel Peace Prize winning President's wars into S. Sudan, Yemen and soon N.
Korea. Americans wanted more wars not less wars. The government freeze need not apply to the military. Donald the
people want you fired.
emilyellen2 APRIL 30, 2017 AT 1:17
PM Trump. A carefully planned and operated coup by Mossad and others. Every button pushed. Makes the Ukraine
look amateur. Right in the West wing now. No middle man required. Trump was never ‘accidental' but
the result of very clever people determined to take over the running of the US and the full use of its military. And they have. You have just watched a US style coup right in the US itself.
Even as mothers text to check their children are safe. Including my own, worrying about me
as I sit overlooking the scene, feeling fearful of this place where monsters lurk and steal lives away in an instant. For
I would ask Sadiq to stop talking. Empty words. Meanwhile, banning pictures of
women in bikinis on the Underground. How does that help?
Please, no hashtag, no vigil, no
tea lights. I am begging you not to light up Parliament in the colours of the Union.
we are not united. We are wrenched asunder.
The patriots of the rest of England versus the
liberals in this city. The endless tolerance to those who harm us, (while the Home Office tries to shift the focus of public
fear to white terror) — versus the millions like me who face the truth, with worried families and hopeless hearts,
who feel the country sinking.
We are taken under the cold water by this heavy right foot
in the south, a city of lead, so desperately wedded to the multicultural illusion that it can only fight those who love
the country the most, blame those who are most proud to be British, and shout racist at the 52%.
illegal aliens , an 19 and 18 year old , who could not speak a word of English , were allowed to attend a school with a 14
year old American girl . They end up gang raping her in a men's room of the school . And Liberals still can't understand
why and how Donald Trump was elected President ?"
"I take no credit for this piece,I wish
I could but this about rounds it out
You can do what you want with it but
his name will remain unsaid."
-- Paul Reithmeyer
NOTE: Below, a message to Zeke Cohen, a Baltimore city official I observed
in an interview with Tucker Carlson, who made outrageous and reprehensible comments surrounding the high school bathroom
sexual assault on a 14 yr. old girl by two recent immigrants from Central America, ages 18 and 19, here illegally, but attending
that school. Cohen's arrogant and deceitful response in the interview outraged me in a way I seldom experience.
It took serious restraint and me reminding myself of my code NOT to offer to punch this slimebag in the mouth. Given
the opportunity, I'd probably succumb, and make it count.
Saw your interview with Tucker
Carson . To somehow correlate a true escape from a known threat, as you indicated your grandmother did from the Nazis,
with a free-for-all exodus from beyond the southern border into this nation in the 21st Century is sheer, demagogic bullshit.
IF you actually believe this propaganda, then you are among the brainwashed victims of a huge national scam. If these
two rapists are so honorable, just poor persecuted refugees from Honduras, then perhaps you can put your spin on the crime,
and make the typical excuse your peers do every time another illegal immigrant victimized one of us, "us" being
American citizens worthy of protection, not some insincere, canned statement of sympathy after the fact, after the damage
in this case to a 14 year old girl has been done. You ignorant, arrogant dilletante, Baltimore deserves you.
I hope we reach a point where citizens have had enough of misguided shitheads like you, and decide to stand up tall against
your diminishment of our rights to protect ourselves from "enemies, foreign and DOMESTIC". The 1901 argument
about this nation being built by immigrants holds NO wisdom in 2017. Immigrants now are not the people who helped
build the U.S. then. Many, too many, are here to take, including by criminal means, whatever they can. Your BS
cannot disguise what we see every day in this nation. You, sir, are guilty of deceit, simply, by virtue of a role
in city government, espousing the violation of our nation's laws. There is no honor or moral high ground in it.
Liberals are ecstatic that a judge in Hawaii is writing immigration policy for the entire country, and that policy is:
We have no right to tell anyone that he can’t live in America. (Unless they’re Christians—those guys we
can keep out.)
As subtly alluded to in the subtitle of Adios, America: The Left’s Plan to Turn Our Country
into a Third World Hellhole, the goal of liberals is for the poor of the world to have a constitutional right to come
here whenever they want.
The attempt to slander and demonize Steve King is more than an attack on a well-known “border hawk.”
The vitriol hurled at Congressman King is more intense than normal not because he is criticizing other nations or other
cultures – he did not do that– but because he is praising our own culture and values—American values—and
saying we must preserve those values. THAT is what is unforgivable in “post-racial America.”
King has touched a raw nerve and the progressive globalist counterattack has been visceral.To the American left, it is now racist to believe American values are worth defending, worth teaching to our
children, worth preserving for future generations. Anyone who speaks out in praise of American values or suggests American
values may be in danger of eclipse from massive immigration without cultural assimilation—that person and those ideas
must be rejected, then marginalized, and then destroyed.
Leftists don’t merely disagree with you. They don’t merely feel you are misguided. They don’t
think you are merely wrong. They hate you. They want you enslaved and obedient, if not dead. Once you get that, everything
that is happening now will make sense. And you will understand what you need to be ready to do.
The Left's non-stop temper tantrum since Trump's election win is
revealing an ugly underbelly of the Democratic Party - think Rosie O'Donnell mud-wrestling with a pig - where a rogues’
gallery of provocateurs aims to delegitimize conservative rule.
First, some necessary background: for 15 uninterrupted
years of US military escapades abroad, eight of those years on Obama's watch, the Liberal Left could not be awakened from its somnambulist slumber,
not even to hold a meaningful antiwar protest in the spirit of their Vietnam-era forebears.
Notice that the ways of “darkness” and “fear” always seem to be associated with measures which would
actually benefit us. On the other hand, our most worthy institutions are called to mind when they can be used to extinguish
any hint of nationalism. Let’s just hope that the previously naïve American public has begun to wake up
to this insidious campaign to prey upon our otherwise laudable values.
Unfortunately, the Dems are following a dangerously different path. Starting with a wide boycott of the inauguration and
including their boycott of committee votes on Trump’s cabinet and their pledge to filibuster any Supreme Court nominee,
Democrats resemble a party fomenting a secession movement.
Some call it Trump Derangement Syndrome, but that’s
too kind. It’s not a temporarily insane reaction, it’s a calculated plan to wreck the presidency, whatever the
cost to the country.
Democrats are the party of terrorism. The communist globalist are using the muslims to wipe out
the west. It's the Charles Manson theory. Look up why Manson had his followers kill those people. He wanted to start
a race war while his "Family" hid out. Manson thought the black race would win and be so stupid that he and his
Family could rule over them. Obviously, he's insane.....however, the globalist have the same line of thinking. They
are using the muslims to wipe out the west and think that they will be able to rule over the ashes. The muslims think they
in a caliphate and will deal with the globalist later. Eventually the differentiating ideologies of cultural marxism/globalist
and the muslims will collide with one another.
On several occasions I have asked in my columns the rhetorical question: What became of the left? Today I
answer my question.
The answer is that the European and American left, which traditionally stood for the working
class and peace (bread and peace) no longer exists. The cause championed by those who pretend to be the “left”
of today is identity politics. The “left” no longer champions the working class, which the “left”
dismisses as “Trump deplorables,” consisting of “racist, misogynist, homophobic, gun nuts.”
Instead, the “left” champions alleged victimized and marginalized groups - blacks, homosexuals, women and the
transgendered. Tranny bathrooms, a cause unlikely to mobilize many Americans, are more important to the “left”
than the working class
All white-skinned peoples except leftists, including apparently victimized women, are
racist by definition. Racism and victimization are the explanations of everything, all of history, all institutions,
even the US Constitution. This program of the left cuts the left off from the working class, who have been abandoned
by both political parties, and has terminated the left’s connection to the people.
We have recently been sent a copy of the
following most observant edition of the Transvaal Agricultural Union (S.A.)'s "South Africa Bulletin."
THE US ELECTION - A TSUNAMI OF SURPRISES
recent American election win by outsider Donald Trump caught the establishment by surprise.Shock, bewilderment,
introspection: how did this happen?The US (and South African) media, the pollsters, the Clintonistas
– their lock-step mindsets and inability to assess anything independently lost them an election and handed the government
of the most powerful country in the world to a maverick who correctly gauged a groundswell so outside the box that it left
people flummoxed and, worse, confused.How did we get it so wrong, they asked?They
got it wrong because they ignored a few elephants in the room - the country’s racial divide and the liberal establishment’s
concentration on so-called minorities (blacks and Hispanics), while ignoring the soon-to-be minority white American group
who saw the writing on the wall.Apart from the numbers vulnerability, without employment their influence
would sink even further.
Johnstown, east of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, there was once a Bethlehem Steel plant making railroad carriages.More than 12 000 people worked there in the late 1970's.When it closed in 2007, only 390
were left.This type of loss occurred right across America.
During one of his speeches, Donald Trump told his audience
comprising these rust-belt Americans that “this is your last chance”!He knew that they knew
what he meant: white Americans would become a minority in the land of their birth as soon as 2043.In
2014 already, the majority of children under 5 in the US were non-white.Those whose forefathers founded
the most successful country in the world were in danger of losing control over their own destiny.
The republican’s victory was in fact a perfect storm.With a liberal corporate media controlling most news dissemination, and the same old same old suits in charge in
Washington and on Wall Street, millions of ordinary Americans were estranged from the democratic process.Money
said it all: experts including Adair Turner, the former head of financial regulation in the UK, estimated that only about
15% of all capital flow within America’s financial system ends up making its way into the real economy.
Normally one would need
the financial backing of the establishment to become even a candidate for the presidency, let alone get the big job.Trump’s personal wealth enabled him to run as a true independent.
The establishment had become so cock sure of its control entitlement
that it ignored citizens’ dinner table conversations.“People viewed formal institutions
with profound scepticism and retreated into “social silos” of informal close-knit family groups and social allies
upon which they relied for information”.(Janine Wedel, George Mason University, November 2016)
Social media crept up on
the establishment press which lambasted and ridiculed Donald Trump to the point where it was mostly ignored.If anything, people voted against the media as much as they voted for Trump.
As a racial melting pot, America is an abysmal failure.The country’s “racial divide” was a subject of virtually every TV panel discussion, with Trump
disparaged as a pernicious opponent of inclusiveness.Fights broke out at meetings, Trump was blamed for
violence and many Americans deplored the “tone” of the campaign.
But a lot was at stake in this election.Many couldn’t
see beyond the latest CNN poll.Who would eventually control America? Already there
were over 11 million illegal aliens in the country.This is a very large number of undocumented people.Had the Democrats won, they would have legalized this group (mostly Hispanics) adding to the numbers of a ”minority”
which in a few years’ time would have become a powerful voting block.The US’s Pew Research
Centre says the Latino population will triple in size and will account for most of America’s population growth from
2005 through to 2050.Hispanics will make up 29% of the US population in 2050, compared to 14% in 2005.No wonder Ms. Clinton courted the Hispanic vote.
Many whites saw the writing on the wall.Their support for Trump wasn’t
only about jobs, it was about self-preservation.
Trump’s victory was a follow-on from a British Brexit (the polls and the media were wrong on that
one too!), and the hasty closing of borders in European states reflected the panic among those citizens as they witnessed
the new year Cologne assaults by “refugees of Middle Eastern descent” and the general behaviour of people alien
to their European culture.A rape in an Austrian swimming pool by a Syrian man shocked many citizens.Walls went up virtually overnight , and a camp at the French port of Calais descended into a nest of crime, with attacks
against trucks on their way to England a regular occurrence.
German chancellor Angela Merkel was made to eat her words after her disastrous “we need a million
people” statement.She told the Bundestag that she wanted the world to see “a kinder face
of Germany”.Her people turned on her.They wanted none of the aliens in their
midst.Inclusiveness sounds good at the protest meeting, but next door?
During a march in Cracow, Poland, one politician told the
media that Poland didn’t want anyone “who doesn’t share our values”.Suddenly
Europe woke up to the fact that everyone is not equal, and that colour of the skin takes second place to alien norms and
This awakening to values
as the cohesion of nations has been slow in coming.The lessons have been bitter, as in France where
nine million Muslims still live in ghettos.Embittered Muslims.Many born in Europe,
have caused the deaths of hundreds of Europeans in terror attacks.The most surprised at this phenomenon
is the British establishment.For all their sophistication, they clearly know nothing about genetics
or the selectivity of values.The British jihadist is no longer a lone wolf – Britain’s former
head of domestic intelligence Dame Eliza Manningham-Buller says that “over 100 000 of our citizens (of mainly Pakistani
and North African descent) consider the July 2005 terror attacks in London justified”.The British
have completely ignored the role of race and culture in people, whatever citizenship they may possess.
Says Christopher Hitchens (Vanity Fair June 2007):“For the British mainstream, multiculturalism has been the official religion for so long that any criticism
of any minority group has become the equivalent of profanity.And Islamic extremists have long understood
that they need only suggest racism in order to make the British cough and shuffle with embarrassment”.
Europe now realizes what
many South Africans have always known – racial differences usually signify other differences, much more serious and
virtually impossible to overcome. There is a huge chasm between values, cultures and behaviour.This chasm exists all over the world –there are hundreds of examples.
In Japan, mixed race people face ridicule and rejection.They are referred to as hafu, or half Japanese.Immigration to Japan is restricted to a trickle,
and the idea that all Japanese belong to the same race is strong. (Al Jazeera America, September 8 2015).Arabs
still use insulting terms to describe blacks.Australia’s immigration policies are criticized throughout
the world, but Canberra couldn’t care less.They have seen what an ANC government has wrought upon
a so-called non-racial South Africa.
There are the Dalits (the untouchables) of India – millions of them. The Rohinga of Burma and the
Tamils of Sri Lanka are oppressed minorities.The relentless violence and killings between the Arabs
of Sudan and the blacks of South Sudan is ongoing.UN peacekeepers are permanently stationed there.
In Tunisia there is racial discrimination against
the 15% of the population that is black.(Al Jazeera 21.10.16).The Roma of Europe have
never been accepted into mainstream European society.Most live in separate areas.
The values and norms that accompany racial differences are
the things that cause friction.You don’t see litter in parks or streets in Europe, but this sight
is symptomatic of Africa and other third world countries.Government phones are answered in civilized
countries but not in the third world.If you walk into a post office in Australia, you will be served
with civility and competence.In South Africa, the person behind the counter often resents your presence.This possible descent into alien values which could play a future pivotal role in the life style of Americans is
what Trump is trying to prevent.He wants America to remain a European-oriented country.
You cannot teach values. You
can teach someone to fix a tap but you cannot teach him to worry about wasted water.Integrity, honesty,
persistence in the face of adversity, responsibility for a job well done are not skills, they are values.They
come from within.They are the hallmarks of a national character.When these values
are not shared, friction results: hence the European walls, the camps and the “not in my back yard” declarations.
The Republican president-elect
appears to have salvaged America from a fate like South Africa’s in the nick of time.
U.S. immigration policy is a joke - a bad joke that President-elect Donald Trump estimates costs our economy $113 billion
per year and hurts millions, including both U.S. taxpayers and non - U.S. citizens waiting in line to come here legally.
next president knows we can do better. The rest of us should help him try.
2016 will go down in history as the year when a big divide between groups of people in the western world became visible, a
divide that had until then been papered over by real or imaginary wealth, as well as by ignorance and denial.
and media conspire to paint for the public a picture of their choosing, they can be very successful, especially if that picture
is what people very much wish to see, true or not. But as we've seen recently, our traditional media have become completely
useless when it comes to reporting news; the vast majority have switched to reporting their own opinions and pretending that
In her impassioned speech, Streep called on her peers and fans to join with her in donating to the Committee to Protect Journalists:
"We need the principled press to hold power to account, to call them on the carpet for every outrage. That's why
our founders enshrined the press and its freedoms in our constitution," she said.
She's right, of course. But one
wonders is Streep even aware, for instance, that the Obama administration has prosecuted more whistleblowers than all of his
predecessors combined? It's a tradition Trump is likely to continue, of course, but it's rather strange that the issue
never crossed her mind until now.
And where was Streep - only suddenly concerned about how "violence incites violence"
- when Obama was helping Saudi Arabia level Yemen, bombing funerals and wedding parties? Or when his "humanitarian intervention"
in Libya went so disastrously wrong that it turned the country into a failed state, allowing the terrorist group ISIS to flourish?
Or when the great uniter earned himself the nickname ‘The Drone King' as he expanded the US drone program and conducted
ten times more strikes than George W. Bush?
RT:International affairs expert Michael Operskalski said that “there is spectrum within
the Polish society that comes from the extreme right and extreme church forces who try to exploit the immigrant question,
which is not the question for Poland at the moment.” Do you agree with him?
Absolutely not. In fact, I think that equating resistance to migrant influx with the extreme right is exactly the mistake
that West European politicians are making. There are millions of perfectly decent non-racist people who feel that something
very important is happening in both the demographic and social sense, and that their quality of life is going down as a
result. If we look at the situation in France, in Poland, even in Germany, where the welcoming atmosphere for immigrants
was absolutely amazing last year, this has changed not because these people are extreme rightists, but because they have
perfectly understandable grievances and apprehensions about the future.
In Poland and other Central and Eastern
European countries, people see that Angela Merkel’s policies have produced problems which will not be solved in years,
if not decades. And they do not want to create no-go areas in Warsaw, Krakow, Bratislava, Prague, and Budapest. They do not
want to have the ghettoes into which no policeman dare venture on his own. I would say simply [tying] this to the opportunism
of the extreme right, which wants to exploit this mythical threat, is exactly the kind of elite view that underestimates
the genuine feeling of comprehension of millions of perfectly decent middle-of-the-road Europeans.
In this episode of the Keiser Report from Pensacola, Florida, Max and Stacy discuss the
‘birthering’ of the Democrats as Keith Olbermann turns xenophobe, and conspiracy theories flourish in the media.
They also discuss Russia’s latest gold purchases. In the second half, Max interviews former Assistant Treasury Secretary
under Ronald Reagan, Paul Craig Roberts, about the attempted Electoral College coup on Trump, and the differences between
the last Cold War and the new one.
USA – -(Ammoland.com)- Now that the British have voted to secede from the European Union and America has chosen a president who has never
before held public office, the French appear to be following suit.
In Sunday’s runoff to choose a candidate
to face Marine Le Pen of the National Front in next spring’s presidential election, the center-right Republicans chose
Francois Fillon in a landslide.
While Fillon sees Margaret Thatcher as a role model in fiscal policy, he is a socially
conservative Catholic who supports family values, wants to confront Islamist extremism, control immigration, restore France’s
historic identity and end sanctions on Russia.
Doublespeak has hamstrung academia – rendering whole swathes of it inoperative, and much of the rest of it either
irrelevant, farcical or pernicious.
In our day-to-day exchanges it has resulted in smile-fronted loneliness and lurking
suspicion as necessary features of a life wherein those of us who comment openly upon the Spandex-coated bars of our prison
are treated as pariahs and lepers.
As in Orwell’s world, our language is undergoing a thinning process and morphing
into a ghettoized Newspeak and Twitteresque literary shorthand. Our grandparents knew what it was to speak and write well
because they acknowledged an objective standard. Those who attained it were regarded as exemplars, and those who had not
could see what remained to be done. Now, as in so much else, mediocrity and approximation are defended as acceptable standards;
simply noticing one’s own shortcomings is elitist – and, therefore, contemptible – while commenting on
another’s is an outright sin.
There are two ways to conquer a nation, a continent, or for that matter a civilization. One is by military invasion. WWI
and WWII are examples of military conquest that failed because of the heroic efforts of the United States and allied European
nations. Another method is slower, but is equally effective: conquest by demography, driven by overpopulation.
It’s irresistible, enticing and addicting. And, as News10.com reports, it’s available 24-hours a day all over the world to billions of people. Facebook beckons to users seemingly with
a two-prong approach – both the pressure and pleasure to post. We share stories, photos, triumphs and tragedies. It
is ingrained into our daily lives so deeply that studies show people check Facebook, on average, 14 times a day. With
all those eyes all over the globe dialed in and the purchasing power available, the online giant has tapped into a controversial
delivery of data into its intelligence gathering. It all starts with something that you may not even realize
is enabled on your phone.
I have seen the world transported towards increased depravity and tyranny with unfaltering consistency over the course
of my life. I have seen evil objectives achieved under the cloak of the purest of motives with such tedious repetition that
I now accept fabricated concern for the oppressed as the only possible delivery system for genuine wrongdoing.
Internet has allowed unsanctioned viewpoints to escape into the ether. Clearly, those at the top of the pyramid want to
standardize and geld alternative media as has been done with the mainstream. There remains only the question of which compassionate
grounds will prove most fertile for growing that particular crop.
The UK’s Guardian hints at the opening salvo
of the coming river of gush which will sweep all right-feeling individuals into the rapids of having nothing but appropriately
gelded information to access; the righteous cause this time: the fact that women need to be protected from ‘hate’.
Prior to the mass invasion of Europe,
liberals controlled debate by means of crude stop-words (bigot, racist, etc.) or accusations of a lack of compassion (with
themselves as the arbiters of compassion, naturally). But there is a sea change occurring.
Europeans – terrified though they are of being thought anything but good, kind and orthodox, no matter
their private opinion – are now afraid of something else. They can see that the liberal doctrine of obeisance before
each and every outsider in which they have been schooled – if left unchecked – is going to leave them interlopers
in the lands their fathers died defending.
In the United States, the European-American population
in 2015 will become a minority group as it gives way to a 51 percent Latino-Mexican-Hispanic majority by 2042—a mere
26 years from now. Canadians will become a minority in their own country sooner. Europeans already face minority status
in their own countries within decades.
SPRINGBOK CYBER NEWSLETTER
October 2015 edition
As we have commented previously, it is not so much the
current swarm of mainly Muslim migrants invading Europe themselves who anger us the most regarding this most worrying situation,
but rather the self-hating Europeans who seem to be welcoming these interlopers into their own homelands with their sickening
“Welcome Refugees” campaigns.
this regard, seemingly inevitably in these “politically correct” days, it is the leaders of the Christian churches
(of most, if not all denominations), who are the greatest to blame. The Pope of Rome has “boasted” about opening
up accommodation in the Vatican complex itself for these mainly Islamic migrants, Angela Merkel has cited her own Lutheran
upbringing as the main reason for her misplaced compassion, and it is the clergy at the Malvern Anglican Parish Church who
are whipping up the campaign to pressurize the Council of this most unlikely provincial town to house far more of their
fair portion of these aliens. The ironic thing about the attitude of so many Christian leaders in this regard, of course,
is that these mainly Muslim invaders seek to supplant the very Christian nature of European society which they claim to
stand for. The Mohammedan religion has such a fierce hold over its adherents that there is absolutely no chance of any of
them converting to Christianity, whereas it has always been the duty of Muslims to conquer the World for Islam by any method
possible. It is just as if the entire Christian church now has a death-wish.
This present writer recently visited Leicester Cathedral, which in spite of its supposed
spiritual nature had a number of overtly political propaganda posters adorning its walls and fences advocating support for
a “Refugees Welcome” campaign. Leicester Cathedral, however, was much in the news earlier this year when, after
an intense lobbying campaign, it became the last resting place for the bones of King Richard III. As all students of medieval
history know Richard III illegally usurped the throne from his nephew King Edward V, and then had both him and his brother
murdered in the Tower of London. In order to justify their glorification of this most unworthy of all monarchs the Dean
and Chapter of Leicester Cathedral now loudly proclaim that the charges against Richard III were “unproven”,
without any evidence being offered to justify this preposterous claim. So according to them six centuries of historians have
been wrong! Who else had the motive to murder the Princes in the Tower we therefore ask – and who else had the means?
To return to the present day, is it any wonder therefore that a church which honours a child-murderer of the past should
now seek to act as an apologist for the attempted murder of an entire people and culture?
As historians of the period will again know, Richard III was deposed barely
two years after he had usurped the throne from his nephew. When Henry Tudor – who was to become King Henry VII, and
who had an equally strong, if not stronger, claim to the crown than Richard III – landed in Wales he only brought
a small group of fellow-exiles from France with him, but so strong was the unpopularity of Richard III that he quickly managed
to pick up supporters to swell his army along the way, so that his eventual victory at Bosworth became a virtual certainty.
Once crowned Henry VII proved a great monarch. He married Elizabeth of York, the younger sister of the murdered Edward V,
and thus united the Lancastrian and Yorkist factions. Within a few years all opposition had ceased, the civil war was over
and the country grew in prosperity. Henry VII’s popularity was confirmed by the fact that although he had to raise
taxes substantially following the excesses of Yorkist rule his popular support barely waivered. By commissioning John Cabot
to sail across the Atlantic the first English settlements were established in Newfoundland – thus heralding the start
of the British Empire. With his Welsh ancestry he also placed in motion plans to unite Wales and England, which came to
fruition under his son Henry VIII with the Act of Union of 1536 – thus forming the initial United Kingdom. Both his
son Henry VIII and his granddaughter Elizabeth I proved magnificent monarchs and the power and prestige of England –
soon to become an integral part of a united Great Britain- increased exponentially. As Britain –
indeed the whole of Europe – confronts a crisis even more threatening than that which England faced under Richard
III what is needed now is for another Henry VII to arise. We are confident that sooner or later such a hero will emerge,
to save not only Britain but all the nations of Europe from the Islamic hordes.
That the Koran’s “practical orientation” has dire consequences for the Muslim woman, as well as for
European non-Muslims in the Islamic expansion, looms on the horizon with the beginnings of civil war in the cities, emphatically
placed against the background of the killing routines in the “Islamic State”. By deeming in line with the dialogue
that this violence has “nothing to do with Islam”, and that it is only its “misuse”, its activists
prove suitable to the practice of Islamo-racism.
Consequently, criticism running counter to the system, or even resistance,
signals the extremely serious psychological deviance of Islamophobia, which requires political correction through
therapeutic indoctrination. If the dissidents insist on the old-cultural democracy and science, they appear as “agitators
and racists” in the eyes of the dialogue players, whose tunnel-vision grants them no thinking room — as has often
been said, “there is no alternative”, — but it forces them to project their own radical
state of mind onto everything which does not correspond to their template of “permitted and forbidden”. In order
to preclude any doubt about the matter, they circulate the mantra that “Islam is not the problem”, which automatically
brands non-Muslims with ontological guilt.
Being that “Islamophobic” resistance against the Islamocentric
diktat is the problem, the “dialogue” acts as a quasi-Islamic institution, which reactivates Hitlerian racism.
For just as the Jews at that time incurred guilt for not being Aryan, so the servants of Islam today are developing an increasing
animosity toward the civil population who are becoming all the more guilty, because they comply much too slowly with the
demands for conformity masked as tolerance. With the notion of a “phobia”, the psyche asserts itself as a substitute
for logic, for if in the absence of an obsession with the enemy, a real culpability were to arise, and thereby freedom of
speech, then the dialogue activists would be speaking of culpophobia.
There is only one political issue: Third World immigration.
If it is not stopped immediately, the entire country will very quickly turn into California on its way to becoming
Argentina and from there Zimbabwe. Conservatives of every stripe will get steamrolled on literally every single
In 1973 an apocalyptic novel was published in France entitled
The Camp of Saints, written by Jean Raspail. The basic synopsis of this novel centred upon a mass co-ordinated
invasion of France, and indeed Europe as a whole, by millions of third world minions. This novel was widely criticized
at the time as being unrealistic and unbelievable – but now, some forty years later, it is coming true, as masses
of poverty-stricken Africans and Arabs attempt to cross the Mediterranean in order to encamp themselves in Europe!
Make no bones about it, these “boat people”
are not refugees – they are invaders. Just because they don’t carry weapons doesn’t mean to say that
their aim isn’t the same as that of previous Islamic invaders of Europe, such as the Moors and the Ottomans. Their
aim is to conquer and supplant the indigenous population of Europe, and to impose their own repressive religion upon
Recently we read a most devastating
article in a publication entitled Vanishing England (No.10 – 20.2.2015) which revealed that the current
“boat people” migration across the Mediterranean was all part of a deliberate plan by the Islamic Caliphate
not only to invade Europe, but more specifically to seize Rome. Ever since an earlier Caliphate seized Constantinople
in 1453, the article went on to illustrate, it has been the aim of Muslims to capture that other leading Christian city
of Europe – Rome. The current Caliph, Abu-Bakr Al-Baghdadi (the spiritual head of ISIS/ISIL in northern Syria and
Iraq) is furthermore on record as stating on 13th November 2014 “The Jihadists will continue their advance
until, by God’s will, they reach Rome” [English translation from original Arabic]. Now of course we know that
most of our readers will not have much time for the theological position and global power of the Vatican, but it must
be accepted that their hierarchy is basically European, and they are therefore infinitely preferable to any Arabic Muslim
theocrats who aim to take their place.
the most frightening aspect in the storyline of The Camp of Saints was the manner in which so many indigenous
Europeans not only passively accepted the third world invasion of their homelands, but in many cases even positively welcomed
them! Again we see sickening parallels taking place in real-life today. Instead of immediately transporting all the “boat
people” rescued from the Mediterranean back to the countries from which they embarked (Libya, and to a lesser extent
Syria), the Italian and other EU authorities incredibly transport them on to the lands which they intended to reach, and
unbelievably allow them to stay there! But the extent of assistance given to the Islamic invasion by the liberal/leftist
forces in Europe actually goes even further than this. The demonstrations organized by the liberal/leftist “rent-a-mobs”
against Western interventions in Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya have intimidated Western leaders into withdrawing from Iraq
and Afghanistan far too early, not taking any necessary military action in Syria, and not putting any “boots on
the ground” in Libya following the overthrow of an earlier would-be Caliph – Gadaffi. Had Western leaders not
bowed to the self-hating demands of the liberal/left protestors then it follows that, with Western forces in control, there
would not have been any power-vacuum in Iraq, Syria and Libya, and thereby no opportunity for the “boat people”
to launch their invasion ventures from these countries.
Alas however it is not only the overt liberals and leftists who have been guilty of complicity with the invasion.
Many self-styled right-wing and/or patriotic leaders – most notably Mr. Nigel Farage, the current leader of UKIP
(as we pointed out in the May edition of the SCN) - have openly sided with the “rent-a-mob” pro-Islamic fellow-travellers
by criticizing the limited Western intervention in Libya and opposing similar military action in Syria. Such incredible
stances adopted by so-called anti-immigration leaders have been at best so naïve that the proponents forfeit all right
to be taken seriously, or else they demonstrate a hypocrisy which is beyond belief. Needless to say, we view such hypocritical
pseudo-patriots with even more contempt than we view the more obvious liberal/left!
But what needs to be done to stop the Islamic invasion and to defeat the Caliphate’s
aim of conquering Europe? First defence spending in all Western countries must immediately be increased substantially,
and then Western forces (and by Western we include Russia) must be swiftly and effectively deployed in the countries most
implicated (Syria, Iraq and Libya) to seek out and destroy ISIS/ISIL, and then to occupy the coastal and border areas
in order to prevent any further migration attempts into Europe. Once these military aims have been accomplished then a
second wave of intervention from the great European nation-states must be enacted, but this time in the form of new colonial
administrators who can re-establish order and good governance. Once this has been done then it should be relatively easy
to repatriate all non-Europeans currently living on the European continent back to their lands of ethnic origin. Finance
to accomplish these aims could come in part by abolishing all overseas aid budgets – after all eradicating the causes
of poverty and establishing effective and non-corrupt administration is surely the best form of foreign aid which we can
possibly give to the ordinary citizens of these third world countries!
Donald Trump is a capitalist, celebrity, and entrepreneur
who has gained the attention of the right, the left, and the leftist mainstream media. Unfortunately, this attention has
culminated in an overt attempt to discredit his position that mass immigration is doing incredible damage to our country.
Racist accusations have been levied - invectives of last resort bandied when facts fail to substantiate an argument.
Trump's statements have infuriated the left and resonated with Americans, who recognize an orchestrated unarmed immigration
invasion when they see it. How accurate are Trump's observations?
Illegal alien crime
has observed that:
When Mexico sends its people, they’re not sending their best.…
They’re sending people that have lots of problems, and they’re bringing those problems to us. They’re
bringing drugs. They’re bringing crime. They’re rapists. And some, I assume, are good people.”
Both sides need to grow up and put America’s interests first—and
that means doing what’s right for our economy, our national security, and our public safety,” wrote Trump. “According
to a Government Accountability Office (GAO) 2011 report, America’s prisons house 351,000 criminal aliens who committed
a crime after having already broken the law by entering America illegally.”
taxpayers pay for 351,000 criminals who should never have been here in the first place is ridiculous.”
Indeed, Trump noted that the government’s own figures estimated the incarceration costs of these illegal criminals
to be $1.1 billion.
The report tallies approximately 3 million arrest offenses attached to the incarcerated criminal alien population. Of these
offenses, half a million were drug related, 70,000 were sexual offenses, 213,000 were for assault, 125,000 were for larceny/theft,
and 25,000 were for homicides. Based on the GAO’s sample of criminal aliens, they estimated that their study population
of 249,000 criminal aliens was arrested about 1.7 million times, averaging about 7 arrests per criminal alien.
not one one of these crimes would have occurred absent the immigrant [alien] who committed it – in other words, without
admitting these individuals, there would have been at least 70,000 fewer sexual assaults, 25,000 fewer slayings, 125,000
fewer robberies, and so forth.
The U.S. Sentencing Commission publishes conviction data which reveal that 38 percent of federal convictions in FY 2013 were of illegal aliens, and nearly
43 percent were legal immigrants or illegal aliens. Specifically, FY 2013 convictions represented:
of drug trafficking convictions
25 percent of kidnapping/hostage taking convictions
56 percent of drug
15 percent of money laundering convictions
20 percent of national security convictions
7 percent of murder convictions
Unfortunately, rape and most murder convictions are state crime and
are not included in federal conviction data.
Based on the above data, US Government data reveal that illegal aliens
clearly commit a disproportional number of crimes resulting in criminal convictions. How does that relate to the proportion
of illegal aliens in the general US population? According to the Census Bureau, there are currently 321,300,000 people living in the United States. If we use the stale, outdated, and deliberately low
official government figure of 11 million illegal aliens living in the United States, then 3.4 percent of people living in
America are illegal aliens. Thus, illegal aliens would be convicted at a rate varying from 2 to 16.5 times the norm for
convictions of Americans.
However, a more realistic estimate is that between 20 million and 40 million illegal aliens reside in the United States. If we assume 38 million, that would amount to 11.8 percent of people residing in America. Comparing that percentage to
conviction rates reveals that illegal aliens are convicted at a rate of .6 to 4.75 the rate of Americans, depending on the
As noted above, these data do not include most rapes and murders. Breitbart reported that in Texas alone over the last three years, more than 2,000 illegal aliens were deported after committing sex crimes,
and nearly a thousand illegal aliens have been convicted of sex crimes against children. Breitbart further reported that:
Illegal Traffickers Are Responsible for More Than 90% of the Heroin In America
Of 78,022 primary offense
cases in fiscal year 2013, 38.6 percent were illegal alien offenders. The majority of their cases (76 percent) were immigration
related. Of total primary offenses, 17.6 percent of drug trafficking offenses and 3.8 percent of sex abuse were illegal aliens.
Of 22,878 drug crime cases, 17.2 percent were illegal aliens.
Nearly Half of Federal Crimes Occur In Just 5 of
94 Districts Along the Mexican Border.
Trump's observations regarding illegal immigration are irrefutable.
Sadly, Americans have died at the hands of illegal aliens who should have been deported according to any semblance
of sane immigration enforcement. Kate Steinle, murdered at point blank range in San Francisco, and the Savvas Savopoulos family, tortured and murdered in DC are but two examples of vicious crimes committed by aliens who should have been deported.
Donald Trump is exceptionally
concerned with the impact of globalism and global trade agreements on Americans. Analyst Nevin Gussack has noted that “Trump’s economics and aspects of his national security strategy challenge the Washington Consensus of
globalism, free trade, and other internationalist policies.”
Trump remarked after NBC cut ties with him that: “If NBC is so weak and so foolish to not understand the serious illegal immigration
problem in the United States, coupled with the horrendous and unfair trade deals we are making with Mexico, then their contract-violating
closure of Miss Universe/Miss USA will be determined in court.”
Indeed, Trump's criticism of trade
globalism is a defining aspect of his candidacy.
Complicity of Mainstream Media
statements are easily substantiated, both Univision and NBC have dropped Trump because of his outspoken comments. The leftist
mainstream media leans notably in the Democratic direction and is clearly flustered with a candidate like Donald Trump who
can neither be bought nor cowed. Breitbart has reported that Mexicans - that is, immigrants from Mexico - vote 3 to 1 Democratic.
The media also relies on some confused data sets when discussing alien versus native
crime rates. For instance, studies cited by the media consider all crimes committed by the children of illegal aliens to
be native crimes — not foreign crimes. The same goes with all aliens in general: their children’s crimes are
counted as native crimes, not as result of immigration policy. The media also typically does not draw distinctions for country
of origin, economic status, or any other useful information considering the immigrant population.
This is important because
(as [Heather] Mac Donald has explained in previous writings) data from the pro-immigration Migration Policy Institute has shown that “between the foreign-born
generation and their American children, the incarceration rate of Mexican-Americans jumps more than eightfold, resulting
in an incarceration rate that is 3.45 times higher than that of whites”
Time and again, during interviews with Trump, or segments covering his comments about
illegal aliens, the media regularly quote statistics that prove legal immigrants commit less crime than native-born Americans.
This number is chaff, a distraction. Mark Murray of NBC News has been especially dishonest about this.
talking about legal immigrants. No one is. Everyone is in favor of legal immigration, and those statistics have a lot to
do with it.
Trump needs to call the media out on this cheap apples and oranges tactic.
The reason the
mainstream media is so hostile to Donald Trump is effectively exposed in the Canada Free Press article Why They Can’t Stop Trump, which reports that:
A 2014 study by Professor Marisa Abrajano on the coming backlash to immigration
policy not only explains the Donald Trump phenomenon, but also why the liberal media are so determined to destroy him. The
media know that Trump’s appeal threatens the ability of the Democratic Party to continue to fool white voters into
embracing liberal policies that destroy their own communities.
Her academic paper, published by the Brookings Institution, was clearly designed to warn liberals about how a “broad backlash”
to immigration could damage the Democratic Party. She said a backlash could not only “shift the balance of power between
Democrats and Republicans” but benefit “rightward leaning candidates throughout the country” who want to
do something about it...
Hence, the key to Democratic Party success lies in manipulating the minority groups and
immigrants into voting for Democrats in overwhelming numbers, as they currently do, while also conning a significant number
of whites into voting Democrat. This is a con because the Democratic Party has no interest in protecting the interests of
white people as a political or special interest group...
“Immigration and other factors appear increasingly
to be pitting the declining white majority against the growing non-white minority,” she wrote. That majority may have
found its voice in Trump, a man unafraid of the liberal media and the GOP establishment, which wants to continue the losing
strategy of pandering to the minorities who overwhelmingly vote Democrat...
The media have no problem with blacks
and Hispanics voting for Democrats in large numbers and affirming and protecting their own racial identities. But when whites
do it, it suddenly becomes racism.
The media's complicity to de-emphasize illegal immigration is nothing
new. Two years ago, the Associated Press dropped the term illegal alien when referencing illegal aliens, thus further obfuscating information about crimes committed by illegal aliens. Indeed,
immigration status is routinely suppressed by the mainstream media in crime articles.
Such complicity goes hand-in-hand
with the Obama Administration's actions to release criminal aliens and to essentially eliminate immigration enforcement
in the United States.
Donald Trump's outspoken observations about illegal immigration and globalism may well
represent a turning point in the focus of the 2016 election.
We have recently received the following most interesting
and informative analysis of the attempted Islamic invasions of Europe in the past and the manner in which they were
defeated from Dr. Peter Hammond of the estimable Frontline Fellowship in Cape Town. Although long, it is well worth reading
if you want to know more about the true nature of expansionist Islam.
UNDERSTANDING THE CRUSADES
US President Barack Hussein Obama
has raised the issue of the Crusades as “evil done in the Name of Jesus Christ” as some kind of justification,
or distraction, from Islamic Jihad today. It is impossible to understand the Crusades without first understanding the five
centuries of Islamic Jihad that preceded it.
Reaction to Jihad
were a reaction to centuries of Islamic Jihad. Muslim armies had conquered most of the Byzantine Empire. The enemy was literally
at the gates of the greatest Christian city in the world at the time, Constantinople. Muslims had conquered Spain, Sicily,
Southern Italy and many of the islands in the Mediterranean Sea.
Persecution and Piracy
Vast territories which had once belonged to Christians were now
under the rule of Islamic rulers who abused the Christians, looted churches, kidnapped, tortured and ransomed Christian
pilgrims. Millions of Christians were being enslaved by the Muslim world. Muslim Pirates were threatening Christian shipping.
Christian lands were threatened by Islamic raids and full scale invasion.
Even before the death of Muhammad in 632, Muslim forces were already
raiding the Byzantine Empire and Persia. Both Byzantium and Persia were weakened by incessant wars against one another.
The Arabs were able to exploit the exhaustion of the Persians and the Byzantines, not only by hit and run raids for plunder
and loot, but also by sustained military campaigns to wrest substantial territory away from these vast empires.
Invasion of Syria
was the first Arab conquest. At that time Syria was a province of the Byzantine Empire. The capital of Syria, Damascus,
was the oldest continually inhabited city in the world. The land of Syria was far more fertile than the land of Arabia. After
centuries of Byzantine rule Syria had fallen to the Persians in 611 and were retaken by Byzantine in 630. As the Persians
had destroyed the institutions of Byzantine rule, a leadership vacuum had developed.
Betrayed from Within
As the Byzantine Empire employed many
Arab mercenaries to guard against their raiding kinsmen from the south, the defection of most of the Arab defenders left
huge gaping holes in the defences of Syria. During key battles, the defection of Arab mercenaries, who were meant to be
fighting for Byzantine, was decisive in turning the tide of battle against the Christians. Soon the Muslim Caliph established
Damascus as the capital of the growing Islamic Empire.
The next target was Persia, which at that time included Mesopotamia,
what is today known as Iraq. Here as well, whole units of the Persian cavalry consisted exclusively of Arab mercenaries.
The Muslims managed to exploit the conflict of loyalties by persuading whole units of Arab mercenaries to turn traitor and
join the Muslim side. Soon even the heartland of Persia, what is today known as Iran, was conquered by the Muslims. Yet,
the Persians continued to rebel against Muslim rule for at least another century.
Caliph Al-Mansur moved the capital
of the Muslim Empire from Damascus to Baghdad. From this base, Muslim armies moved out to conquer the Indus valley of India
(what today is known as Pakistan).
Betrayal of Jerusalem
Palestine was part of the Byzantine province of Syria, the decisive defeat of the Greek forces at the Battle of Yarmuk left
Jerusalem vulnerable to attack. Many Jews, hostile to the Greek Christians of the Byzantine Empire, welcomed the invading
Muslim forces and opened the gates of Jerusalem to the Caliph in 638. Despite this, the Caliph prohibited all Jews from
living in Jerusalem.
Massacres in Egypt
Egypt was a province of the Byzantine Empire. The abandonment of Syria and Palestine by the Greek forces
left Egypt particularly vulnerable and isolated. The first invasion of Egypt in 639 by the forces of Caliph Umar was unsuccessful.
In 640 a force of 12,000 Muslims attacked and succeeded in luring the Byzantine army out from their secured walled cities,
whereupon they were ambushed and slaughtered in great numbers. The Muslim invaders then massacred the inhabitants of the
undefended city of Nikiou and a number of other towns.
The Betrayal of Alexandria
Alexandria was the second largest city in the Christian world at
that time. When the Arabs attacked the city of Alexandria they were repulsed with great losses. The Arabs thereupon withdrew
out of range of the catapult shots and arrows of the walls and began what should have been a hopeless siege. As Alexandria
was a port and the Byzantine navy had supremacy of the Mediterranean they could have easily resupplied and reinforced Alexandria
for as long as necessary. However, inexplicably, the new governor of Egypt, Cyrus, betrayed Alexandria, and all of Egypt,
by handing it over, without a fight, to the Muslim invaders.
Massacre in Alexandria
Four years later a Byzantine fleet of 300 vessels arrived at Alexandria
and re-conquered the city of Alexandria with ease. So the Greeks once again had an impregnable position behind the formidable
walls of the city. However, a foolish and arrogant commander led his soldiers out, in a very ill advised move, and was ambushed.
Even so, the Arabs had no chance of conquering Alexandria. It was at this time that a traitor opened the gates of the city
to the Arabs and the Muslims poured into the city massacrering, plundering and burning until more than half of the great
city was destroyed.
Arming their Enemies
Recognising their great naval weakness, the Muslims turned to the Egyptian shipyards and commissioned Christian
workmen to build them a fleet. They hired Christian mercenaries to do their navigation and sailing. In 649 this entirely
mercenary fleet enabled the Muslims to invade Cyprus, Sicily and the island of Rhodes.
At this point an opportunity arose that would have enabled the Christian
Byzantine Empire to regain all their losses as the Muslim world erupted in a vicious civil war. Muhammad’s cousin
and son-in-law, Ali, waged war against Muawiyah, the cousin of the murdered Caliph Uthman. Ali was murdered and Muawiyah
became Caliph. From this point Islam was divided into the Sunnis and the Shiites. However, the Christian world failed to
take advantage of this opportunity to regain their lost territories.
Conquering North Africa
At this time, with the exception of conquered Egypt, the entire
north coast of Africa was still under rule of the Byzantine Empire. The Arabs targeted the desert dwelling Berber tribe,
many of whom had converted to Judaism. After much bloodshed and bitter resistance, the Berbers were subjugated and enlisted
as allies of the Arabs. In 698 a combined Arab and Berber Muslim army of 40,000 swept over the coastal cities taking the
ancient capital of Carthage, which in 705 was razed to the ground and most of its inhabitants massacred.
In 711 an army of 10,000 Muslims from
Morocco crossed the Mediterranean at its narrowest western point to land at Gibraltar on the southern coast of Spain. King
Rodrigo marched a hastily assembled army south from his capital in Toledo and was defeated in a battle at the river Guadalete.
The king was drowned and the Berber Tariq Ibn-ziyad sent the king’s head to the Caliph in Damascus. Within 7 years
the Moors (as the Spanish called the Muslim invaders from Morocco) had brought most of Spain, which they called Al-Andalus,
under their control. The Muslims called Spain the Emirate of Cordoba. On the site of a Christian cathedral in the city of
Cordoba the moors built a large mosque.
There were numerous Muslim invasions of Sicily, in 652, 667 and 720 - each of which
were defeated. In 827 the Muslims invaded again with 10,000 troops. The local Christians fought back furiously and it took
more than 70 years for the Muslims to conquer Sicily, after “much fighting and many massacres.” After a prolonged
siege, Palermo fell in 831. Cyracuse held out until 878. Taormina held out until 902.
From Sicily the Muslims invaded southern
Italy, conquering Taranto and Bari in 840. The historic city of Rome was looted in 843 and all the famous churches were looted
in 846. The Muslim occupation of Sicily and southern Italy lasted for over 200 years.
Cyprus was invaded and conquered by
the Muslims in 653. Rhodes in 672. Sardinia in 809. Majorca was conquered in 818. The island of Crete was invaded by the
Muslims in 824. Malta fell in 835. Plainly, the popular propaganda line that Islam only advanced peacefully, and
that Jihad was only a defensive concept is fiction. What were Saudi Arabians defending in Spain and Cyprus?
be noted that, at that time, most of the armies of Persia and the Byzantine Empire were poorly trained. Most were used for
static defence of strong points such as garrisons and walled cities. Very few were trained in manouvres for battle. The
Byzantine Empire was particularly overstretched with insufficient soldiers to maintain their vast empire. Most of the soldiers
employed by both Byzantine and Persia were foreigners who served mainly for pay, and many of these were Arabs, most of whom
ended up deserting to the Muslim side.
The use of camels provided the Arab invaders with superior mobility, particularly across
the deserts. Even the Arab cavalry rode between battles on camels, leading their horses. The camels enabled the Muslims
to outflank imperial forces by using desert routes. When confronted by superior forces the Arabs withdrew into the desert
to avoid battle. This much greater mobility allowed the Arabs to select and attack smaller forces and destroy them before
reinforcements could be sent. The imperial forces of Byzantine made themselves vulnerable by spreading out and trying to
defend everywhere at once, or wore themselves out marching in fruitless pursuit of a battle. These battles the Arabs normally
avoided until they greatly outnumbered their enemies.
immensity of the Byzantine Empire stretched the Byzantine forces far too thin. However, the Arabs concentrated their forces
to attack specific areas at a time.
Myth of Islamic Tolerance
propaganda makes great claims as to the tremendous tolerance which was meant to have been shown by Muslim rulers to Christian
subjects. Actually, these claims began with Voltaire and other 18th century humanists who continually tried to
cast Christians in the worst possible light and in this case invented the fiction of Islamic tolerance. From the very beginning
Muslim authorities went to great lengths to humiliate and punish Dhimmis, Jews and Christians who refused to convert
Islamic policy was that Dhimmis must feel “inferior” and subjugated. Laws were passed that Christians
and Jews were not allowed to ride horses. Jews and Christians were compelled to wear marks of their religion when they were
amongst Muslims. Non-Muslims were prohibited from wearing clothing similar to that of Muslims. Non-Muslims were forbidden
to be armed. Non-Muslims were severely taxed (Jizya). No new churches of synagogues were allowed to be built. Jews
and Christians were prohibited from praying aloud, or even reading the Scriptures aloud, not even in their homes or churches
– lest a Muslim accidently hear them.
Massacres of Christians
In 705 the Muslim invaders of Armenia assembled all Christian nobles in a church and
burned them to death. Massacres of Jews and Christians were common. In Morocco over 6,000 Jews were killed in 1033. Even
more were murdered in Grenada. Tens of thousands of Christian civilians were massacred by the Muslim invaders of Cyprus in
1570. Any Muslim who converted to any other faith was condemned to death. Those today who attempt to portray Muslims
through the ages as enlightened supporters of multi-cultural tolerance are either ignorant or dishonest.
assurance that it was impossible for Islamic armies to ever be defeated by “infidels”, Muslim armies
have suffered numerous defeats throughout the centuries. In 672, the Caliph Muawiyah attempted to conquer the capital of
the Byzantine Empire, Constantinople. With the massive fleet he had built up by the Egyptians, he transported 50,000 fighting
men through the Dardanelles, (the narrow straight linking the Mediterranean with the Black Sea).
Clash of Civilizations at
assault on Constantinople in 672 was described as “the fiercest, which had ever been launched by the infidels against
a Christian stronghold…” Numerous historians hailed the Christian victory over the Muslims assailing Constantinople
as “A Turning point in the history of mankind.”“The fact that it held saved not only the
Byzantine Empire, but the whole of European civilisation.” As another historian put it: “Had the Muslims
captured Constantinople in the 7th century, rather than the 15th, all Europe – and America, might
be Muslim today.”
Despite modern myths about the supposed superiority of Islamic culture and technology, the fact is that the
Christians possessed superior technology and used it to defeat the Muslim invaders on numerous occasions. The walls of Constantinople
were an engineering marvel, a massive outer wall with towers and superb battlements, and behind it an even stronger inner
wall, 40 feet high and 15 feet thick.
The Christians also had what was called “Greek fire”. The Greek
engineer Kallinikos of Heliopolis had developed an incendiary weapon which literally destroyed the Muslim fleet. Greek
fire was effectively a primitive flame thrower which included a pump that discharged a stream of flaming liquid through
a tube projected from the bow of a galley. They could also use their catapults to hurtle pottery containing Greek fire
over 400 to 500 meters away. When it struck, it shattered, burst into flame, splashing its blazing liquid over large areas
of the enemy. On several occasions the Byzantines rode out and incinerated the Muslim navy.
Defeats at Constantinople
With their fleet burned to a cinder
the Arab invaders were soon stranded and starving. Discouraged and demoralised Muawiyah surrendered and agreed to pay an
annual tribute of 300 pounds of gold to Byzantine. In 717, the Muslims once again tried to conquer Constantinople. A massive
fleet of 1,800 galleys attacked Constantinople. The Greek Christians rode out and with their Greek fire, pumps
destroyed virtually the entire fleet. Most of the Muslim attackers were either burned up or downed. The next year, 718, the
Muslims tried again with a new fleet and this was again defeated by Greek fire. Most of those galleys that managed
to flee were destroyed in a devastating storm. Only five Muslim galleys survived the attack of 718.
Defeat at Toulouse
While the Muslim ambitions of conquering
South Eastern Europe were frustrated by the apparently impregnable Constantinople, Muslim armies had attained far greater
success on the Western edge of the Mediterranean, subjugating Spain. In 721, Al-Samah Ibn-Malik al-Khawlani the Caliph of Aldover (Spain), led his forces north of the Pyrenees Mountains
to sack the city of Toulouse. For three months the city resisted his siege. Then Duke Odo of Aquitaine mobilised an army
of Franks to lift the siege of Toulouse. The Muslims were taken by surprise and most were slaughtered as they fled before
the Christian cavalry.
Islamic Invasion of France
In 732, Abd-al-Rahman mobilised a massive army of 80,000 fighting men to invade Gaul (present
day France). As they moved north from Spain the Muslims plundered cities and laid waste to the countryside. Muslim historians
recorded that Al-Rahman “burned churches and imagined he could pillage the Basilica of St. Martin of Tours.”
An Arab historian noted: “The hearts of Abd-al-Rahman, his captains and his men were filled with wrath and pride”.
He was to meet
his match in Charles Martel, the Hammer. Martel, the son of King Pippin of the Franks, was an unusually tall and powerfully
built man. Charles Martel was already famous for his great military exploits. He was perhaps the only man in Chrisendorm
at that time who could have provided a serious challenge to the advancing Muslim forces.
The Battle of Tours
The Muslims were completely taken
by surprise when they found their path to St. Martin of Tours blocked by dense lines of well-armoured infantry on the crest
of a hill. With forests on both flanks, Martel had chosen his battleground well, forcing the Muslims to charge uphill. For
seven days skirmishes were fought, before Al-Rahman ordered his cavalry to charge the Christian Franks. Charles Martel had
his men closely packed forming a solid shield wall, and their long spears thrust into the ground to deter cavalry. A contemporary
wrote of the Franks: “firmly they stood, one close to another, forming as it were a bulwark of ice.”
Six times the Muslim cavalry charged the Frankish line and each time they were repulsed with severe casualties. Soon the
battleground was filled with vast numbers of dead and dying, and the repeated furious charges of Muslims seemed to have
absolutely no effect on the steadfast Christians who stood resolute in their ranks.
When the Muslims heard that some Franks
had broken into their camp, they fled from the battlefield to protect their loot. At this the Franks unleashed their cavalry
and inflicted even more severe casualties on the fleeing Muslims. At least 10,000 more died that afternoon, fleeing from
the field. Among the dead lay the Caliph Abd-al-Rahman. Even at this point, Charles Martel maintained the discipline of
his infantry, leaving the pursuit to the cavalry. Prepared to face a renewed onslaught the next day, the Franks slept in
their ranks. The next morning scouts reported that the Muslims had fled leaving their empty tents and siege engines behind.
The invaders fled back beyond the Pyrenees to Spain.
That was not the end of the Islamic threat to France. When the Muslims
tried to invade Gaul again in 735, Charles Martel and the Franks gave them another severe beating. Many historians recognise
the decisive victory at the Battle of Tours, or Poitiers, as one of the most important battles in world history, a turning
point, absolutely essential to the survival of Western civilisation. In 759, the last foothold of Islam in South Eastern
France was retaken. The Muslim armies never crossed the Pyrenees after that. In fact they began to be defeated even in Spain.
The Muslims never
conquered all of Spain. Many Spanish stalwarts stood firm on the Northern coast of Spain, by the Bay of Biscay, in an area known as Asturias. From the Christian Kingdom of Asturias, beginning
in 741, the Reconquista, or the re-conquest, of Spain began. The first area to be liberated from the Muslim invaders was
Galicia. In 778, the grandson of Charles Martel, Charlemagne,
marched two armies into Spain to begin the liberation of South Western Europe from Islam. Within a few years, Charlemagne’s army had forced the Muslims south of Barcelona. The fall
of Toledo on 25 May 1085, was a strategic and psychological disaster for the Muslims.
In 1092, King Alfonso VI of Castile, recalled Spain’s most
famous knight from exile. Rodrigo Díaz de Vivar,
known as El Cid, liberated Valencia in 1094, and defeated the Muslims
time and again. Frequently he seized the initiative and charged besieging forces, turning the tide and inflicting decisive
defeats on the Muslim occupiers. In Valencia he turned nine mosques into Christian churches. El Cid’s resounding victories,
often against overwhelming odds, inspired Christians throughout Europe that the Muslim invaders could be defeated.
Liberating Italy and Sicily
In 873, the Byzantine Emperor, Basil
I, defeated the Muslims throughout Dalmatia and liberated much of Southern Italy from the Muslim invaders. In 1038, the
Byzantines determined to put an end to Muslim piracy by liberating the island of Sicily. Their invasion was well timed, as
the Muslim Emirs in Sicily had turned on one another and were involved in one of the many internal conflicts and betrayals
that frequently erupt in the Muslim world. George Maniakes employed Lombardian mercenaries and Norman knights to help liberate
Sicily. Within two years over a dozen major fortresses had been taken, major battles had been won and Messina and Syracuse
were in Christian hands.
when the Byzantines alienated the Vikings, William of Hauteville (Iron Arm) led the Norsemen to seize the southernmost province of Italy. Although
vastly outnumbered, the Normans routed the Byzantines time and again. Iron Arm and his Vikings prevailed and the Byzantines never attempted to fight an open battle with them
in Italy. Southern Italy was transformed into a Norman Kingdom. In 1061, Robert Guiscard, Duke of Southern Italy determined
to seize Sicily, first conquering Messina and then Palermo. In 1098, Robert Guiscard’s eldest son, Bohemond, let the Crusader forces that took
the city of Antioch. Bohemond
became the ruler of the Kingdom of Antioch. From the time of the Norman conquest of Sicily, the Muslims never again regained
control of that island.
Muslim Navy Annihilated
a huge Arab armada, of a thousand galleys, was annihilated by a vastly smaller Byzantine fleet off the island of Cyprus.
Only three Arab ships survived the engagement.
Victories over Islam
These are but a few examples of Christian victories and Muslim defeats before the Crusades even
began. The myth of Islamic invincibility was plainly propaganda. Before the Knights of Europe marched, or sailed, to the
Holy Land, they already knew a lot about their Muslim enemies. Most importantly, they knew how to beat them.
That phrase finally revealed the full horror of the crash
of Germanwings flight 9525. Co-pilot Andreas Lubitz waited for the pilot to leave the cockpit, then locked the door to prevent
his re-entry. After which Lubitz, for reasons unknown and perhaps unknowable, deliberately steered the jet into a harrowing 8 minute plunge ending in an explosive 434 mph impact with a rocky mountainside. 150 men, women and children met an immediate, unthinkably
Lubitz, in his single-minded madness, couldn't be stopped because anyone who could change
the jet's disastrous course was locked out.
It's hard to imagine the growing feelings of fear and
helplessness that the passengers felt as the unforgiving landscape rushed up to meet them. Hard - but not impossible.
Because America is in trouble. We feel the descent in the pits of our stomachs. We hear the shake and rattle of
structures stressed beyond their limits. We don't know where we're going anymore, but do know it isn't good.
And above all, we feel helpless because Barack Obama has locked us out.
Jared Taylor, American Renaissance, March 23, 2015
Jared Taylor’s account of the Russian
On March 22, I addressed the Russian International Conservative Forum, held in Saint Petersburg. Its purpose was
to provide a forum for politicians and thinkers united in their support of national traditions and in opposition to globalism.
There was a strong sentiment throughout the meeting of support for Russian sovereignty and European national independence
in the face of pressure from the United States. As Yury Luybomirsky of the Russian National Cultural Center explained at
the beginning of the meeting, the goal of all the participants was “to preserve national identity and culture,”
and that independence from outside pressure and influence was essential for that purpose.
This was not a meeting
that went unopposed. Demonstrators protested outside the conference site, and the meeting had to end early because of a
telephoned bomb threat.
The meeting may have been an unprecedented assembly of European “far-right” groups,
including Forza Nuova (New Force) of Italy, the National Independence Party of Finland, the Attack Party of Bulgaria, Golden
Dawn of Greece, the National Democratic Party of Germany, and the newly-organized European group, the Alliance for Peace
and Freedom. These parties have been tarred with the extremist labels, but are all dedicated to preserving European and
Russia was represented by such groups as the Russian Imperial Movement, New Russia, and the editor
of nationalist magazine Russian Observer. There was also a contingent of Cossacks, dressed in traditional military
uniforms. The Russians strongly supported the effort to establish autonomous regions in Eastern Ukraine.
at least 30 speakers, all of whom gave remarks of about 10 minutes each. Most were in Russian, but the conference provided
headsets for simultaneous interpretation into English. Here is a sampling.
Georgios Epitideios of Golden Dawn pointed
out that 10 percent of the population of Greece is now composed of illegal immigrants, and that a mass influx of foreigners
jeopardized national identity. He denounced the Greek government’s efforts–including imprisonment of party leaders–to
“exterminate our movement.” He said that Golden Dawn opposes European sanctions against Russia and noted the
common orthodox faith of Greeks and Russians.
Mikhail Remizo of the Russian Institute of National Strategy emphasized
that Russia and Bulgaria would never join the European Union, which is in favor of globalization and opposes “the national
project.” He also noted that Chinese economic pressure can be added to American political bullying as a growing threat
to European autonomy. He argued that a healthy middle class was vital to national identity, and that the post-crisis collapse
of the middle class is a grave concern for all patriots.
Ironically, he said, nationalists fighting globalization
must have a global strategy. By this he meant that those who believe in national identity must cooperate as widely as possible.
It is the Right and not the Left, he added, that will fight the leveling forces of globalization and defend the traditions
and culture of the West. He concluded by quoting Arnold Toynbee–“Civilizations are not murdered; they commit
suicide”–noting that the West is approaching this point.
Sam Dickson from the United States also spoke,
and introduced himself as a representative of the real Americans who believe in peace with all countries and who want to
preserve our race and civilization. He began with the old proverb, “one hundred repetitions make one truth:”
the defenders of the truth can be overwhelmed by repeated lies.
He argued that one of the current lies is that Russia
is a danger to the United States. He pointed out that it shares no borders with us, and has never fought a war with the
United States. Indeed, it was Vladimir Putin’s solution to the problem of chemical weapons in Syria that spared the
United States the costs and the casualties of military operations against Syria. He also praised Mr. Putin for encouraging
higher birthrates in the West, while American rulers work for our dispossession by promoting Third-World immigration.
Davidson Yukka of the National Independence Party of Finland pointed out that in some respects Russia is freer than any
other country in Europe. Some forms of speech have come under attack in countries such as Finland, where it is possible
to lose one’s job for criticizing homosexuals or opposing gay marriage. “The European Union is an idea that
has failed,” he said, “but the politicians are still riding this dead horse.” He concluded that if our
enemies abuse and denounce us it is because we are right.
One of the Russian delegates, Vadim Zazimko, touched on
another theme that was common throughout the conference: the importance of a national economy that serves the nation. He
said that the state should be active in guiding the economy and that it was a myth to think that state-owned companies are
always inefficient. He said that the Chinese model of government-directed economic growth is one worth studying, since the
unbridled search for profits can have destructive results.
Olyvia Wyssa was the one French representative, and
is a member of the Rhone-Alpes Regional Parliament. He said that he was active with the French National Front for many years
but left the party when Marine Le Pen was voted in as its leader. He said that freedom of speech is in grave danger in France
and that Miss Le Pen has been reluctant to fight the authorities on this point. All over Europe, he pointed out, people
are in jail because of vaguely worded laws against “incitement of hatred” or for taking a dissenting view of
historical events. In fact, he said, the situation is so bad that Russia is probably the only European country in which
a meeting of this kind could be held. “Freedom of speech is the key to victory,” he concluded.
Zhivov is a coordinator for Fight for the Donbass, an organization that supports Russians who are fighting in Eastern Ukraine
to establish an independent republic. Like many of the speakers, he denounced the Ukrainian government, which he called
“fascist” and under American control. American thinking is alien to that of Europe, he said, and Europeans must
be free to pursue cultural and national independence. He called Russia the eastern pole of Western civilization, and said
that it was prepared to help all Europeans.
Jim Dawson, a Scot, is head of an organization called League for Life.
He opposes abortion, which is helping reduce the numbers of Europeans. “If you don’t have babies you have no
future,” he said. “We need babies in order to survive.” He emphasized that Christianity is the traditional
faith of the West and that without Christianity the West will not survive. He called it the vaccine against liberalism.
The only Ukrainian speaker at the conference was Victoria Shilova, who runs a humanitarian organization in the Eastern
Ukraine called Antivoyna. She said she is a Ukrainian patriot, but that it is important to draw a distinction between the
Ukrainian government and the Ukrainian people. She said that 90 percent of Ukrainians want peace and want to end the fighting
on the basis of Minsk agreements signed by the two parties, but that there are forces in the Ukrainian government that want
to keep fighting. She said that a more accurate count of the deaths in the Eastern Ukraine would be close to 15,000 people,
of whom the majority are civilians. “Weapons will not solve our problems,” she said, “and this fighting
could even lead to nuclear war, which would leave no place habitable.”
Nick Griffin is the former head of the
British National Party and is now active in the Alliance for Peace and Freedom. He argued that Western leaders have the
Midas touch in reverse: Everything they touch turns to blood. He predicted that Europe will either end up as a caliphate
or there will be a civil war, and that it is now Russia’s turn to lead the world and prevent catastrophe. To this
end, Russia should go on a media offensive to counteract the irrational hostility found in the West. RT television broadcasts
are a good first step, but they must be supplemented with a strong social media campaign. Mr. Griffin also argued that Russia
must help replace the dollar as the sole means of international exchange.
At about 6:30 in the afternoon, the meeting
was cut short by a telephoned bomb threat. The entire hotel where the conference was being held had to be evacuated while
police with sniffer dogs checked for explosives. The call was a fake, but it did succeed in breaking up the meeting before
a number of interesting people had a chance to speak: I was sorry not to hear Nikolay Trushchalov of the Russian Imperial
Movement and Orazio Maria Gnerre of the Italian Millennium Party.
It is common to think that there is a monolithic
political position in Russia, but that is clearly not the case. The conference attracted about 40 demonstrators, some of
whom made trouble and were arrested. Nor was the Russian English-language press keen on the meeting. The Moscow Times reported that leftist politicians had called on the governor of Saint Petersburg to cancel the meeting, which it described
in these words: “The forum’s speakers collectively ticked off all the boxes of intolerance and anti-Western
sentiment, egged on by the enthusiasm of the audience filling a conference room at the St. Petersburg
It is common in the West to assume that Russia does not distinguish itself in support of free
speech, but a number of the speakers were probably right: This meeting was an exercise in vigorous free speech that probably
could not have been held anywhere else in Europe..
What follow are the remarks I made at the forum:
It is a great honor and a pleasure to speak to you today, and I am grateful to the organizers of this forum for inviting
We are all united here in our opposition to globalization and in our love of traditional societies. It is these
traditions that make societies unique. They are the qualities that make Russia Russian and France French. These qualities
are treasures that we have received from our ancestors and that we hold in trust for our children. If even a single generation
fails in its duty to pass its traditions to the next generation, these treasures can be lost forever.
As you know,
tradition is under attack. One way is to replace the people who created traditions with an entirely different people. This
is happening in the modern world through immigration. If, through immigration or conquest, the Russian people were replaced
by Chinese, for example, everything that is unique and beautiful in Russian culture would be destroyed.
to destroy tradition is to try to undermine the traditions of a people and replace them with alien traditions.
are two main ways by which tradition is destroyed: by replacing or diluting a people with foreigners, or by persuading a
people to accept alien traditions.
Today, one country leads the world in aggressively exporting its own ideas–most
of which are vulgar or worthless or completely opposed to human nature. That same country also leads the world in promoting
the replacement of Western peoples through immigration from the Third World. That country is the greatest enemy and murderer
of all authentic tradition.
Alas, my friends, that country is my country, the United States of America.
I can tell you this: When my country promotes Muslim immigration into France and Germany, when my country tells the European
Union it must accept refugees from Libya and Syria and Somalia, it is not being hypocritical. It is destroying itself in
exactly the same way it promotes the destruction of the West.
It was not always this way.
The United States
began as an outpost of Europe, of the Christian West. Its language, culture, institutions, religion, and aspirations were
all European and exclusively European. Its first law of naturalization, passed in 1790 allowed citizenship only for “free
white persons.” Until 1965, it had an immigration policy that was carefully designed to keep the country overwhelmingly
Now, people from the Third World are coming in such large numbers that Americans of European origin will
become a minority in just 25 years. Because non-Europeans have so many children, a young white child is already a minority
in his age group.
It is impossible to maintain any kind of tradition in what America is becoming. No country that
is a mix of Africans, Asians, and Central Americans, and a dwindling remnant of aging Europeans can have an authentic culture
and authentic traditions. My country is committing suicide.
The religion of America is no longer Christianity. It
is “diversity.” We are not to believe in Jesus Christ. We are to believe that a crazy mix of races, of languages,
of habits, of religions, of manners is a great and wonderful thing.
The slogan of America is “diversity is our
In 2007, General George Casey, who commanded the American troops in Iraq, announced, “I
firmly believe the strength of our Army comes from our diversity.” What is this? Does the strength of an army not from
good training? From good weapons? From love of country? No. The US Army is strong because it has soldiers from Guatemala
and the Philippines and Haiti and Mexico. This is insanity. But this insanity of diversity is the new religion of America.
But my country is not content just to commit suicide. It wants every Western country to commit suicide. When the United
States was dropping bombs on Serbia in 1999–America loves to drop bombs–General Wesley Clark explained why the
bombing was necessary:
There is no place in modern Europe for ethnically pure states. We are trying to
transition into the 21st century, and we are going to do it with multi-ethnic states.
And for Americans,
multi-ethnic does not only mean Serbs and Croats and Bosnians. It means Arabs, Africans, Asians, Muslims, Hindus–anything
and everything. That is what my country wants for you! Diversity!
And, of course, diversity is the great assassin
of tradition, of identity, of everything that makes a society authentic and unique.
On the cultural level, when my
government is not able to force a country to replace its own people with aliens, it lectures and browbeats them and tries
to destroy their ancient traditions. It claims moral authority on matters that are none of its business.
tells the world that traditional marriage is a prison for women. That any government unlike its own is tyranny. That abortion
is a sacred right. That homosexuals should marry.
My government seems to forget that the last American laws against
homosexuality were overturned only in 2003. Homosexuality was illegal in my country for 400 years, but now we say to the
world: “We were wrong. We were wrong for 400 years. But now we are right, and you must be like us or you are hateful
scum.” This is astonishing arrogance.
<Continued at American Renaissance website at
This socio-political thinking has
led to some curious attitudes toward both policies to facilitate education opportunities, such as the Dream Act, and the treatment of Hispanics compared to African-Americans. Recently a black resident of New York City died when he was wrestled to a concrete sidewalk while resisting arrest for selling untaxed black market cigarettes, avoiding New
York City’s high taxes. Meanwhile, Mayor de Blasio and his fellow Democratic Party members seem to have no qualms
about allowing illegal immigrants to work for cash. They avoid paying income taxes, Social Security taxes, and other
taxes. And their employers avoid paying into unemployment compensation and other taxes. No manager of a fast
food hamburger joint has been wrestled to the ground for avoiding unemployment taxes for undocumented workers.
So President Obama’s executive
action creating a special class of citizens who do not have to obey federal immigration law is not new, it is just the newest
manifestation of a trend, consciously started by Democrats to grow their constituency of the poor dependent on government
handouts. Since illegal immigrants mostly earn low wages, they are eligible to receive over two dozen federal, state, and
local benefits. I have estimated that in Chicago these benefits amount to at least $80,000 per year, per family.
The largest amounts go to education and block grants. This figure doesn’t include health care. The actual
health care costs of illegal immigrants are not easily found. For the most part they are not tabulated.
What will you accept as real--your
intuition that something is deeply amiss in America, or the official propaganda that all is well?
Kalashnikovs, mass murder and fears
of a YouTube beheading in the heart of Paris. France is already in shock as the news of the CharlieHebdo Massacre sinks in.
But the shock waves will also be felt all over Europe, and in Britain, as people grasp the enormity of what has just happened.
This wasn't a criminal gang attack.
It was a well-planned and ruthlessly executed assault by a highly trained military commando. It is likely that at least the
ring-leader has military experience - either gained in the French army or fighting in one of the proxy wars against Arab nationalists
that began when the USA, Britain, Israel and France promoted the so-called Arab Spring and then trained, armed and provided
air cover for the 'rebels'.
This is the first real example of 'blow-back' from that criminal lunacy, but it will definitely not be
used the term 'vicious, wicked faith' back in 2004, the BBC and British state tried to put me in prison for it,"
says Nick Griffin.
in the wake of the revelations about the gigantic scale of the sexual grooming scandal, of the mass murders and sexual enslavement
of non-Sunnis in Iraq and Syria, and in the light of this multiple execution for the 'crime' of publishing a cartoon,
will any of the liberals who condemned me then STILL deny that it is the perfect description of the brutally aggressive strain
of Sunni Islam that has infected so many young Muslims?
"More recently, after my visit to Syria in June 2013, I published a video interview
with a captured Islamist in which he said that the aim was to bring their Jihad to Europe. "The Christians - they are
the real target" he told me quite openly.
"Again, the Powers That Be tried both to ignore my warning and to persecute me for it. But
can they deny any longer that I was right about that too?"
Now Nick Griffin has two new warnings:
"If the French police and army fail to track down
this gang and kill them in a lightning attack, then expect to see a staged beheading video that takes the horror of the murder
of Lee Rigby to a new level of Islamist depravity.
understand this: The shots in Paris will echo around Europe. They mark the real beginning of a Europe-wide Civil War. It cannot
now be avoided, because it has already started. By fits and starts it will grow worse and worse, until the horror ends in
one of only two possible ways:
"The submission of the West to a new and truly Dark Age, with religious intolerance
and slavery and savage slaughter for the indigenous peoples of Europe; or the wholesale deportation not just of the extremists
but of every community which sympathises with or harbours them.
"This is now inevitable. The only question
that remains is whether, whichever way it ends, the peoples of Europe will, along the way, also settle scores with the elite
psychopaths, crooks and anti-white racists who created mass immigration and imported the Muslim Menace in the first place."
Jared Taylor's speech at the "forbidden" NPI conference.
Editor's Note: This is Jared Taylor's address
to the National Policy Institute's "Future of Europe" conference in Budapest, Hungary. The event was held despite
persecution from the highest levels of the Hungarian government. Mr. Taylor's comprehensive write-up of the conference
This Site may
contain links and pointers to other Internet sites, resources, and sponsors of the Site. Links to and from the Site to other
third-party sites, maintained by third parties, do not constitute an endorsement by us of any third parties, the third-party
sites or the contents thereof.
In the 21st Century and the age of the Internet, the gulag may not be just a place with dim lighting, bad food and prison
work, but a cold and lonely corner of the web where people cannot find your website, your IP is blocked/censored/flagged,
and one cannot stumble upon the truth, and cannot communicate freely if one wishes to discuss anything of any substance.
God has not given
us fear; But power and love; and a sound mind.
News items and photos republished under Fair Use Doctrine of the Internet. Global Gulag dot US makes no money from advertising
and does not request financial support from our readers. Items posted are for informational and educational purposes